From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3F8A052A; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E431140D68; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D635B140D60; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA2A5C0160; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 07:54:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 07:54:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= 0x0hygBhytPKjjOWTBECwTqgKl7F3lhlebpfq+0M044=; b=WubvJBCYRcBUkQEm OdQUMOZUujFHP9tkvb/N3rzD4TCtPahIeNKLMMnGhLkW3wIHAZ85Rsm8759rJrzz AaQ6SM2T7stzEJbwrcfhE0tgEqE1ARpmnW8tJ6oAruNJq9xrFW4sNrUjhL8hf88D F+who1C/GarQ1Q7qGzVLuUWZ/xnRtCExh7q+6o6PCwpt0jVevjoao3+M+tQHPT6b Rz9ASs6q3OiTb+zi0aLnIdqg8ztpFLmP4aUTORmvNt1nnsQeyyF19OJtU8RyPEcK SGFv0KAsuqiJMCjqnuA7wS+SlYaAPacekHEa18fGIkurE62XWqmu1cyS07uL9cWe ulHVTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=0x0hygBhytPKjjOWTBECwTqgKl7F3lhlebpfq+0M0 44=; b=dE5jcW3c4KkuzEGuyrRT6WuYXVpg90LoW1s5hOFS8giIghViU4hEk98d7 uCr4LCH82K7/FB+Pv2brVw/dkGGLeHutUUaH8n6qBwGwQCckI4NiV5knoJWIlXlg U9dgNnuyu03MSY7x2+HDVM4rCWwPFNftrQlkwDrOGPPeLKkCpOL3RyWRCNOMiPbT th/E8OwSTFZ5QZ2ZhiHAWyxPL8E3bGPHNE+j/4I9LGVYXtXZSo6s3L5YPacXUrDi BBQYnwOETqBs6biYN4ugMRnBrJ3AKDNuD9uKcoLaIyDGRsZTyBNdlskq9V1y90g0 dMr3yU5aJdys+GJ0vGVbV2P9CBxew== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdekgdeghecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8EA281080067; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 07:54:27 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jiawei Wang , viacheslavo@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, rasland@nvidia.com, stable@dpdk.org, Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:26 +0100 Message-ID: <5166983.dj9CPtWFBN@thomas> In-Reply-To: <11002ac2-1a6c-4be8-76ea-acdb25785e8a@intel.com> References: <1611665613-123388-1-git-send-email-jiaweiw@nvidia.com> <1611665613-123388-3-git-send-email-jiaweiw@nvidia.com> <11002ac2-1a6c-4be8-76ea-acdb25785e8a@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: use global default miss for E-Switch sampling X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/01/2021 13:50, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/26/2021 12:53 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote: > > In E-Switch steering domain there was dedicated default miss action > > created for every sampling flow. > > The patch replaces this one with the global default miss action. > > > > Hi Jiawei, > > The impact of the patch is not clear, what was the problem using action per > flow? What will change when global action is used? Is this fixing some problem > or is it optimization by preventing per flow action? > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Since this looks like optimization, I am removing the stable tag for now. > > If it is a fix, please reply with a fixes line, I can update it in next-net. Yes please we must avoid "Cc: stable" without a "Fixes:" line.