From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16321B83E;
 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 23:32:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 24 Oct 2017 14:32:41 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,429,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="166618468"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.241.225.60])
 ([10.241.225.60])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2017 14:32:40 -0700
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 Shijith Thotton <shijith.thotton@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>, Harish Patil <harish.patil@cavium.com>,
 George Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>, stable@dpdk.org,
 Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
References: <20171017201436.65270-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <5180dd9f-9df9-edd5-3feb-c53a51733391@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:32:40 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171017201436.65270-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 21:32:43 -0000

On 10/17/2017 1:14 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> This reverts commit 6b9ed026a8704b9e5ee5da7997617ef7cc82e114.
> This reverts commit 5f6ff30dc5075c49069d684bab229aef7ff0fdc3.
> This reverts commit b58eedfc7dd57eef6d12e2c654a52c834f36084a.
> 
> There were bug reports about terminated application may leave device in
> undesired state:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/049745.html
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/050932.html
> 
> And a proposal to fix:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/051844.html
> 
> Later another proposal triggered the discussion:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-May/066317.html
> 
> Finally a fix patch pushed into v17.08:
> Commit: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of device file")
> 
> Later a regression report sent related to the pushed patch:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/075236.html
> 
> And a fix for regression integrated into v17.11-rc1:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079166.html
> Commit: 5f6ff30dc507 ("igb_uio: fix interrupt enablement after FLR in VM")
> Commit: 6b9ed026a870 ("igb_uio: fix build with kernel <= 3.17")
> 
> Even after the fix qede PMD reported to be broken:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079359.html
> 
> So this patch reverts original fix and related commits. The related
> igb_uio code part turns back to v17.05 base.
> 
> Cc: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> Cc: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Shijith Thotton <shijith.thotton@caviumnetworks.com>
> Cc: Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>
> Cc: Harish Patil <harish.patil@cavium.com>
> Cc: George Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>
> 
> Fixes: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of device file")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---
> It would be nice to solve this issue in LTS release, but being close to
> the release and the error report without details makes it hard to work
> more on this issue.
> 
> Thanks everyone who spent effort for this, hopefully we can continue to
> work on next release cycle.
> 
> Jingjing, there is a i40e commit, was part of igb_uio fix patchset, is
> it generic, or needs to be reverted with this patch?
> Commit: 8cacf78469a7 ("net/i40e: fix VF initialization error")

This patch is no more valid and will be marked as rejected, since instead of
revert, agreed on a solution [1].


[1]
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/thread.html#79815
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/30654/