From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <damien.millescamps@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4669683C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 23:00:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hq7so598622wib.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 14:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=87RFceCEeJDA96LjT/3bLAc278Xo3xfYtkhMBTo5ns8=;
 b=LibcD1q31h8nKq7XHxUYYx6tVtdy5mRUZzwPXOQNrt3Eqy9qsL6MZN0rqVCfysLvz6
 dn5ucX4OPQ2iPCKHo/safgDJrjUj0+tZFq0IpESxRYlKo4tCCDo5cfROC+yBy6GJGOtM
 hg86mbLFyrHLpRaalE1xENBBHbjxsRZaO2ght5D1ak0rrqLnwV1QEudiFf9D0J7XWTtb
 3at5KMF74Qyt3gkymQSO9Suj32ZUQ8Hg4GLjwrelwHSV6IOvd9+5sOQdpUnvCeAtASJu
 G2/w+W8+VTLDpZ0hvan8Qci4ppH6GSsmxKmfBccTBX9UA9rILtajvzVwxDC67z3reRNl
 5VUg==
X-Received: by 10.180.97.106 with SMTP id dz10mr3254641wib.2.1369515660848;
 Sat, 25 May 2013 14:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (mic92-3-81-56-67-82.fbx.proxad.net.
 [81.56.67.82])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id en3sm7373554wid.1.2013.05.25.14.00.58
 for <dev@dpdk.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sat, 25 May 2013 14:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51A12618.3040509@6wind.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 22:59:04 +0200
From: Damien Millescamps <damien.millescamps@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND S.A.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@dpdk.org
References: <519F74F6.3000903@mahan.org>
 <201305241641.38896.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <201305241745.25844.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <5BBC85C7-B39F-4200-AB7B-CD5464BDA431@mahan.org> <51A10FC3.5050703@6wind.com>
In-Reply-To: <51A10FC3.5050703@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks5a25CQ5OkjkuH0/aULeXtJr4Lg2/jeiNp+c/xejXSamCeWGkdC96Yhlo414axdPsVmhv
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Best example for showing throughput?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 21:00:56 -0000

On 05/25/2013 09:23 PM, Damien Millescamps wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> If you are using both ports of the same Niantics at the same time then
> you won't be able to reach the line-rate on both port.

For a better explanation, you can refer to this post from Alexander
Duyck from Intel on the linux network mailing list:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/207295

Regards,
-- 
Damien Millescamps