From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346679E7 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:24:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a4so162449604wme.1 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:24:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=M1BUI+4SFtxQHEat0N+N7ObF8VMbmAwtCWrB5pkht40=; b=pq87WGXe5t6FfI3JMuTvqwEozFh/m/CPsu+sQi53BmY4xbNmqYu2pkzP/gWwuSe5xK 4XqHPLPoi81OE3Dh9aairSyIr6CquRo+lSS56hNLhe8R2dWCk+dJTKSjEZTvNSqHAxYm QdyG/zexMT8VYtaLEgZynAZPc/+OOcpSoSOJZW2OIdn5e+O/buOvR0GjbqhmwGgoss2w 1YAiA3DicF0sZeBEarU9G2EXjnxgIHehNR07KKCzDAvQdanXQRoC3tGhUpdvUpDysEvh LQIo/hvAjZyv/toljeMCQeLWWD4yzgzGvIxCca7x6cr69Gc2HWy2T+r57dNDoBiQBfsv Telw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=M1BUI+4SFtxQHEat0N+N7ObF8VMbmAwtCWrB5pkht40=; b=D8vqGZXJ4w5zG9YPMz/CXYWbUK83dklPJM/x5TN9vARn4ypNjV6bQS4l0ccChBSjc2 ney6dQ6yd/7tzVLONhOYrZbsQwxiG2JS4EDNN3L3TpMUTc9NLcIRgULtga1pc+GKx6yt 3h0WNckdBQnN92ftg1O1xakPwJ/XKyOC5R/+bZVdV8M+MZhiYUinAaMoFM2w6Xfc+Api zh+6OV2Bl+ZkKz44YCozVhK8+znPi0N0Ne2U0QgNrc/yr+72cg16FSheKXQDOuPAdP56 Lk2EPQ3IPMTGdHJLpF8O/DEBELC3onz6QFtW7H3cRcJcLk9qOZLqhOy6ryiM3sqjN/jb ZI3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORsC78sAHd/OJuHnx/nPp/NKIaJII+DAiX3sezmPE1oYm5201gjJmb5yV3Pa/ApiALi X-Received: by 10.194.60.145 with SMTP id h17mr30338108wjr.47.1456147454909; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:24:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z65sm19511032wmg.1.2016.02.22.05.24.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:24:14 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:22:40 +0100 Message-ID: <5212003.dKKWlXxaE8@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:24:15 -0000 2016-02-22 13:12, Kantecki, Tomasz: > Off the mail list, we received feedback that extending EAL commands is not an option due to Intel Architecture nature of CAT. > Consequently, we changed direction when working on V2 PQoS patches in roder to: > - reduce DPDK PQoS code print and reuse existing open source code > - remove IA specific options from EAL > > Current V2 patch, yet to be shared on the mail-list in a few days, implements a sample code (reuse of skeleton) that links against existing 01.org PQoS library. This eliminates need for code included in V1 librte_pqos patch. > The same sample code implements a C module that parses application specific part of the command line with CAT configuration options (same format as V1 EAL command). The module is easy to re-use in other applications as needed. > In the future, if there is a need to change this C module into a regular DPDK library then we'll be happy to do so. > > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above? So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration? You just want to show how to use it with DPDK?