From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC2AA00C4; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:49:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A07427A1; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:49:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81AE40041 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C083202005; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:49:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:49:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=tZhbAcX8hSLwD0 ciSVbLld4esPvKvLncuEb7opyr8xk=; b=SZe582davguUAiZzc7XynzTyOJWS5x h58fI1QzVhvQoLFgcddrwfZGe2mGp7Y5oeNVFRoKM3yhFVhXWdPPk8bWd6NDk7iE x0o07YhrkMstgTihklT/p98DAMIFSG/e6DTrcEkXBg3xNEvaJsuTZvX0WG7w/hxN nf0idzW6UtZj8j9AELP1Vdb/0rd+iSAXaaSQFuZHe3TK2wEfkPwLfWwuk6QenQj+ GlX1MSNZdgSyGEnE1VzB9w5xtAmzm0ODlBdtAPNVqqPq3J4VIV3ZuvP5snYr4yp0 Tr0hC/uuvDuKXDIiRFHXCmTS20ZdF4OCTfhEs/i0WPPOvbZclfPEgvlg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=tZhbAcX8hSLwD0ciSVbLld4esPvKvLncuEb7opyr8 xk=; b=l+CYW2StWyws7kY7ErNCDnf0hX1FBXJk9oaVAf/QcxoMDIKv8II8Wr+RI 31qMT7T2HFX095l/5QDLCXuxoMDWClEv5F8e7TYSonEUFAozahKPOQRIuaNyrXMd wND4Gprg8pMSdLwBHN5EbIy5wCWIPH/szYOt01y8aK5V+OAuY6HOpH1ElMb0Vc9o wh2aVn0h0qia6pBP63+WXRR8OZKdTOug3TjAsHZ2dY+7MBulMO1/Z07IggRtGfIa FsoVsbeW7JUgF1BoAmtQOQiBGVXfTS6M5XqfmuKakPYCB6gb3QkPzCAG4By5cFkA dEjT9H6xnvdA3iWEZSGUI2inbdJsw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfeehgdduheefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:49:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/83] remove unnecessary null checks Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <5235444.Sb9uPGUboI@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220124174719.14417-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20220124000518.319850-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20220124174719.14417-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 24/01/2022 18:45, Stephen Hemminger: > Stephen Hemminger (83): > lib: update documentation of XXX_free() functions > devtools/cocci: add script to fix unnecessary null checks I think it is good to have the first 2 patches separate, but the rest could go in a single third patch.