From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BBB678B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:10:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id mz13so1904789bkb.16 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:11:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o7I4fgYXAF5vAhxPsFMFmzmaEN5iyfXLePT66mbt3+8=; b=NKf7kopqUC79wJ6j61ROkgHPIXrJmd/aO2q7hYdMcVWrD5B3N7W+j8aZdSWJwgJX3a YbbMae1LBrTVDXNy/Dk4p6m/Iuh8RSg5KO82H025QhclsSwWgw+HZ6+T7pS0FrSgsAe1 mzNCP5uSHpdOp0Y0q82Dz9+BTKTms5w59rMf26jCwPvjd8UZjOp2HJbdMTVWUpii0W6R oX9FDi+p7soWfc11C5gjpKcMu94X0dCtwnRI3Jum4Prmv26u3GlcSEeW0oxnUlIDmFnY bKaOm/DicDTjMbPkggJfO+gHAIA9Xup8fTyso9psUFEFqHMr4zu6JQ9ck1oAsR4TKFxa 4RnA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnOaWawBp6kJq3AtYQiMq7NsfrG5j5ad/WyNnbDDjpXrKj5J9cCVhPVsuyhiZ3OxyrhDwQ7 X-Received: by 10.204.69.202 with SMTP id a10mr980999bkj.36.1380535893714; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturne.dev.6wind.com (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pk7sm11870910bkb.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52494E55.4020507@6wind.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:11:33 +0200 From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Pappas References: <5241B572.5090009@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] L3FWD LPM IP lookup performance question X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:10:57 -0000 On 26/09/2013 23:16, Chris Pappas wrote: > we are having some numbers regarding the performance of L3FWD and would > like to confirm that they make sense. > So, for L3FWD and 1500byte packets we get 120Gbps out of 12x10Gbps ports > (so we get full throughput) and for 64byte packets we get 80Gbps. 12x10 with 80Gbps@64 bytes => 119Mpps You did not describe your system: number of cores, sockets, PCIe slots, etc. Whatever the HW environment you are using, you should run the same tests but with testpmd in order to qualify the limits of the IOs for your platform. Best regards, Vincent