From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209B53195 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:05:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C9421B42; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:05:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=WCnlTooGdUEidjwz9Fy9I5avdnoBcsW9cGK4CaepwOQ=; b=Rkx4xXgQXrrM 972iX35DWwc0rjGeuczfaS2wLmaStm2oC2+mYVTWuSbSPwZkPdl5FA6os5No4nUq icAr4aWVY+SxQdcRuFngjhyiAJku5QEILyhND1AEkJ0XtvY+tIU0u7BZBqmiRv7N VwKwqRdGNM93fI4WB3cuMTlHrooS8XA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WCnlTooGdUEidjwz9Fy9I5avdnoBcsW9cGK4Caepw OQ=; b=nFWHTStq9ftPAwvRnbZsfuZUFyN9qsI7rsF9om7DOJnwJ+5xJs8ADOARi NXW6Eg3SQtEc6KoAk68TElzOpdgUienI/b4j24L0bTxR3sT2Gpf5GPvInn/wX7tV ximSsSpY9/E1cwRAoi+Pm0s2/6V5dp7hTPK1d8Q+JSYYJMlWrQmWNbEXK/LkKYuY OlsJ6r+q2n7hwDhOIgLmkvehke/LazlDc9T5wsKX2yP0KdN7IMYGg4wxuJ6UmsgD rCpWZXjjB0lcWZi8FtqdUYDb5IUA4SQ/wMMkbHocKUVnrcYijTN2brcoSGh9DfQ4 enlqzuEN2ZTfrOaIerEJhuZ9gs+mg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrieeggddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjg hfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcu oehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtd efrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19B2210106; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:05:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jay Rolette Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Jerin Jacob , Akhil Goyal , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Xu, Qian Q" , Yongseok Koh , Maxime Coquelin , "Zhang, Qi Z" , Shahaf Shuler , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "O'Hare, Cathal" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:05:31 +0100 Message-ID: <5280552.ziep6B5itu@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1773388.o8hTKI9FYH@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:05:35 -0000 25/01/2019 17:53, Jay Rolette: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > > Hi Jay, > > > > 25/01/2019 14:42, Jay Rolette: > > > > * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree. > > > > Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of > > > > testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested. > > > > > > We do @ infinite io. > > > > Would you be OK to share your test plan and the results please? > > I thought Intel was asking if anyone was using the LTS tree (ie., is it > worthwhile to continue maintaining and testing it). We don't test DPDK as a > standalone entity. We have test plans and such for our product, which > includes DPDK, but nothing that would be of interest elsewhere. OK > Sorry if I misunderstood the original question. No, I misunderstood your reply :)