DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyal <dmitryvyal@gmail.com>
To: Michael Quicquaro <michael.quicquaro@gmail.com>,
	 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: mayhan@mayhan.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Rx-errors with testpmd (only 75% line rate)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:52:00 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DFDB10.2090906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAD-K97KDoGVow6dVrKdRtCyD+wgJchO4OJFpGTRDgiaq5=Stw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello MIchael,

I suggest you to check average burst sizes on receive queues. Looks like 
I stumbled upon a similar issue several times. If you are calling 
rte_eth_rx_burst too frequently, NIC begins losing packets no matter how 
many CPU horse power you have (more you have, more it loses, actually). 
In my case this situation occured when average burst size is less than 
20 packets or so. I'm not sure what's the reason for this behavior, but 
I observed it on several applications on Intel 82599 10Gb cards.

Regards, Dmitry


On 01/09/2014 11:28 PM, Michael Quicquaro wrote:
> Hello,
> My hardware is a Dell PowerEdge R820:
> 4x Intel Xeon E5-4620 2.20GHz 8 core
> 16GB RDIMM 1333 MHz Dual Rank, x4 - Quantity 16
> Intel X520 DP 10Gb DA/SFP+
>
> So in summary 32 cores @ 2.20GHz and 256GB RAM
>
> ... plenty of horsepower.
>
> I've reserved 16 1GB Hugepages
>
> I am configuring only one interface and using testpmd in rx_only mode to
> first see if I can receive at line rate.
>
> I am generating traffic on a different system which is running the netmap
> pkt-gen program - generating 64 byte packets at close to line rate.
>
> I am only able to receive approx. 75% of line rate and I see the Rx-errors
> in the port stats going up proportionally.
> I have verified that all receive queues are being used, but strangely
> enough, it doesn't matter how many queues more than 2 that I use, the
> throughput is the same.  I have verified with 'mpstat -P ALL' that all
> specified cores are used.  The utilization of each core is only roughly 25%.
>
> Here is my command line:
> testpmd -c 0xffffffff -n 4 -- --nb-ports=1 --coremask=0xfffffffe
> --nb-cores=8 --rxd=2048 --txd=2048 --mbcache=512 --burst=512 --rxq=8
> --txq=8 --interactive
>
> What can I do to trace down this problem?  It seems very similar to a
> thread on this list back in May titled "Best example for showing
> throughput?" where no resolution was ever mentioned in the thread.
>
> Thanks for any help.
> - Michael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-09 19:28 Michael Quicquaro
2014-01-09 21:21 ` François-Frédéric Ozog
2014-01-22 14:52 ` Dmitry Vyal [this message]
2014-01-22 17:46   ` Wang, Shawn
2014-01-27 20:00   ` Michael Quicquaro
2014-01-28  8:31     ` Dmitry Vyal
2014-02-10 17:34       ` Jun Han
2014-01-22 20:38 ` Robert Sanford
2014-01-23 23:22   ` Michael Quicquaro
2014-01-24  9:18     ` François-Frédéric Ozog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52DFDB10.2090906@gmail.com \
    --to=dmitryvyal@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mayhan@mayhan.org \
    --cc=michael.quicquaro@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).