DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal_common_cpuflags: Fix %rbx corruption, and simplify the code
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:37:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5331BECE.3070601@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395767000-28709-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

On 03/25/2014 10:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
>  int
>  rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(enum rte_cpu_flag_t feature)
>  {
> -	int value;
> +	const struct feature_entry *feat;
> +	cpuid_registers_t regs;
> +	static uint32_t max_leaf = 0;
> +
> +	if (!max_leaf) {
> +		/* Get the max input leaf for this processor */
> +		rte_cpu_get_features(0, 0, regs);
> +		max_leaf = regs[REG_EAX];
> +	}
>  
>  	if (feature >= RTE_CPUFLAG_NUMFLAGS)
>  		/* Flag does not match anything in the feature tables */
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  
> -	/* get value of the register containing the desired feature */
> -	value = rte_cpu_get_features(cpu_feature_table[feature].params);
> +	feat = &cpu_feature_table[feature];
> +
> +	if (!feat->leaf)
> +		/* This entry in the table wasn't filled out! */
> +		return -EFAULT;

> +	if (feat->leaf > max_leaf)
> +		return -EINVAL;

This doesn't quite work.  The max_leaf is per CPUID "group", i.e. the
8000xxxx CPUID leaves have a different limit than 0000xxxx leaves.  So I
would just do this as:

	rte_cpu_get_features(feat->leaf & 0xffff0000, 0, regs);
	if (((regs[REG_EAX] ^ feat->leaf) & 0xffff0000) ||
	    regs[REG_EAX] < feat->leaf)
		return 0;

Returning 0 is the right thing, because this is a legitimate instance of
"this feature is not supported."

The first part is a sanity check that the CPUID leaf group is supported
at all; the second part is the actual limit check.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-25 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1395330830-1310-1-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-03-20 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC UNTESTED PATCH] " Neil Horman
2014-03-20 17:02   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-20 18:04   ` Neil Horman
2014-03-21 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Neil Horman
2014-03-21 15:03     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-21 17:48       ` Neil Horman
2014-03-24 11:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-24 17:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Neil Horman
2014-03-24 18:09     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-24 19:52       ` Neil Horman
2014-03-24 20:47         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-25 10:41           ` Neil Horman
2014-03-25 17:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Neil Horman
2014-03-25 17:06     ` Chris Wright
2014-03-25 17:37     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-03-25 19:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Neil Horman
2014-03-25 20:51     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-02 11:16       ` Neil Horman
2014-04-02 11:53         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-02 12:42       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5331BECE.3070601@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).