DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	john.mcnamara@intel.com, bluca@debian.org, yskoh@mellanox.com,
	christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] docs: add default that all fixes are backported
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:56:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5332944.6YUZ7rFQxA@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f70448c-9bd5-59b6-7231-3a747ec79062@redhat.com>

29/06/2018 23:39, Kevin Traynor:
> On 06/29/2018 05:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 21/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 6/21/2018 5:00 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >>> Set the starting point that all commits on master branch
> >>> with Fixes tag are backported to relevant stable/LTS branches.
> >>>
> >>> Of course there will be exceptions that will crop up from time
> >>> to time that need discussion, so also add a sentence for that.
> >>>
> >>> This is to ensure that there is consistency between what is
> >>> backported to stable/LTS branches, remove some subjectivity
> >>> as to what constitutes "a fix" and avoid possible conflicts
> >>> for future backports.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> >>> index 0f2f1f3..bbafc37 100644
> >>> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> >>> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> >>> @@ -58,5 +58,7 @@ What changes should be backported
> >>>  ---------------------------------
> >>>  
> >>> -Backporting should be limited to bug fixes.
> >>> +Backporting should be limited to bug fixes. All patches accepted on the master
> >>> +branch with Fixes tags will be backported to the relevant stable/LTS branches.
> >>> +If there are exceptions, they will be discussed on the mailing lists.
> >>
> >> Just to highlight, there are some cased fix is not applicable for stable trees,
> >> for that case "Cc: stable@dpdk.org" tag explicitly omitted.
> >>
> >> a) Fix with backport request:
> >>  Fixes: ############ ("...")
> >>  Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>
> >> b) Fix but backport not applicable/requested:
> >>  Fixes: ############ ("...")
> >>
> >>
> >> So I agree there may be a confusion in b) if the backport is not requested or it
> >> has been forgotten.
> >> Is there anything we can do/change to help stable tree maintainers on this issue?
> > 
> > I agree with Ferruh that fixes without Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > should not be backported, except if it is confirmed that it is a miss.
> > 
> > Can we change the wording to "all patches with Cc: stable@dpdk.org tag" ?
> > 
> > 
> 
> I agree this case should be catered for. That approach will work fine as
> long as most people remember the tags :-)

As maintainers, our role is to make sure the tag is not forgotten.
We use the tool devtools/check-git-log.sh.

> I reworded it a little bit differently to try and also keep the essence
> that as many Fixes as possible should be backported. Otherwise devs may
> use the Cc: stable@dpdk.org based on wildly different opinions about the
> stable branches and what types of fixes are backported.

Yes the most important is to explain the intent.
Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-29 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 16:00 Kevin Traynor
2018-06-21 16:14 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-06-21 16:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-29 16:15   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-06-29 21:39     ` Kevin Traynor
2018-06-29 21:56       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-06-21 18:00 ` Aaron Conole
2018-06-29 21:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] docs: add default that all fixes should be backported Kevin Traynor
2018-06-29 22:02   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-06-29 23:15     ` Kevin Traynor
2018-06-29 23:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Kevin Traynor
2018-07-04 15:22     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-11 21:04       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5332944.6YUZ7rFQxA@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).