From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC064C5CE for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 14:39:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 May 2015 05:39:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,366,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="565880981" Received: from pgsmsx105.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.96]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 May 2015 05:39:40 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by PGSMSX105.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 4 May 2015 20:39:39 +0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.107]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 4 May 2015 20:39:38 +0800 From: "Qiu, Michael" To: Aaro Koskinen , Neil Horman Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community Thread-Index: AQHQhCdlg1RCyqklQ0KpSAVz9bdNYA== Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 12:39:37 +0000 Message-ID: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E602860466B50C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20150501164512.GB27756@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150501171854.GC595@fuloong-minipc.musicnaut.iki.fi> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 12:39:44 -0000 On 5/2/2015 1:19 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:=0A= > Hi,=0A= >=0A= > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:=0A= >>> - GitHub manages the patches via pull requests and can be easily seen= =0A= >>> via a web browser.=0A= >>> - The down side is you do have to use a web browser to do some work, = but=0A= >>> the bulk of the everyday work would be done as it is today.=0A= >>> - I think we all have a web browser now :-)=0A= >> Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make reviewing p= atches=0A= >> faster. In fact, I would assert that it slows the process down, as it= =0A= >> prevents quick, easy command line access to patch review (as you have wi= th a=0A= >> properly configured MUA). That seems like we're going in the opposite= =0A= >> direction of at least one problem we would like to solve.=0A= > I agree. Having a web browser interface for reviews etc. is acceptable=0A= > only if people can still continue to use e-mail if they prefer.=0A= > I don't know how github works in this regard but patches should still=0A= > appear on the mailing list and it should be still possible to comment=0A= > them via mailing list.=0A= =0A= How it comes?=0A= =0A= As I know if use github, the maillist will be meaningless.=0A= =0A= And do you know some area on the earth maybe have issue with github?=0A= =0A= Anyway, Github is OK to me, but I prefer maillist :).=0A= =0A= Thanks,=0A= Michael =0A= =0A= > A.=0A= >=0A= =0A=