From: "Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: modify the mac of csum forwarding
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:52:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028604703736@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8BCD4A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 2015/8/7 9:06, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Michael Qiu
>> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 8:29 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: modify the mac of csum forwarding
>>
>> For some ethnet-switch like intel RRC, all the packet forwarded out by DPDK will
>> be dropped in switch side, so the packet generator will never receive the packet.
> Is it because of anti-sproof? E.g. When the hardware found that the dest mac is the
> port itself, then it will be dropped during TX.
> You need to tell the root cause, and why we need to modify like this.
Actually, it is not the hardware from PEP(PCI End Point) side, but the
switch side.
The TX is OK for DPDK and NIC, but in switch, it receives the packet and
try to forward it, but the dest mac is the same as the NIC which
transmit this packet.
So switch will drop it as "Loopback Suppression Drop" in RRC. This
should only happen when switch forwarding packets using dest mac.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c index
>> 1bf3485..bf8af1d 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
>> @@ -550,6 +550,10 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
>> * and inner headers */
>>
>> eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, struct ether_hdr *);
>> + ether_addr_copy(&peer_eth_addrs[fs->peer_addr],
>> + ð_hdr->d_addr);
>> + ether_addr_copy(&ports[fs->tx_port].eth_addr,
>> + ð_hdr->s_addr);
> Is it really necessary? Why other NICs do not need this?
Because other NICs is connect directly to packet generator...., if we
using switch to connect the generator and the NICs, I think it will need
this.
Thanks,
Michael
>
>> parse_ethernet(eth_hdr, &info);
>> l3_hdr = (char *)eth_hdr + info.l2_len;
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-07 3:29 Michael Qiu
2015-08-07 16:05 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-08-07 18:42 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-08-07 16:06 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-08-07 18:52 ` Qiu, Michael [this message]
2015-08-07 20:37 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-08-07 21:16 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-08-08 0:13 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-08-10 4:45 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-08-26 6:12 ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-09-14 3:37 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-10-13 6:29 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-10-24 16:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-26 19:47 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-10-29 22:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028604703736@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=michael.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).