From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <michael.qiu@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8E35A67
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:37:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2015 13:37:36 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,647,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="539332785"
Received: from pgsmsx104.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.91])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2015 13:37:35 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by
 PGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:37:33 +0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.18]) by
 SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:37:26 +0800
From: "Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon
 <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH]doc: Add performance tuning guide about	how
 to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform.
Thread-Index: AQHQ04c9jLYAD3BOrEmonA37yAGa5w==
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:37:26 +0000
Message-ID: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028604714EEC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1439188487-7302-1-git-send-email-qian.q.xu@intel.com>
 <1593935.xObAPAzFJy@xps13>
 <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8CAC3B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH]doc: Add performance tuning guide
	about	how	to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:37:37 -0000

On 2015/8/10 9:11, Zhang, Helin wrote:=0A=
>=0A=
>> -----Original Message-----=0A=
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon=0A=
>> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 6:38 AM=0A=
>> To: Xu, Qian Q=0A=
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org=0A=
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH]doc: Add performance tuning guide about h=
ow=0A=
>> to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform.=0A=
>>=0A=
=0A=
[../..]=0A=
=0A=
>>> +1. For Intel=AE 40G NICs, special configurations should be set before =
compiling it,=0A=
>> as follows. **Note**: This is very important::=0A=
>>> +=0A=
>>> +      for at least DPDK release 1.8, 2.0 and 2.1, in=0A=
>> <dpdk_folder>/config/common_linuxapp=0A=
>>> +      CONFIG_RTE_PCI_CONFIG=3Dy=0A=
>>> +      CONFIG_RTE_PCI_EXTENDED_TAG=3D=94on=94=0A=
>> Please insert it in a i40e doc instead of here. Then you can reference i=
t.=0A=
> Good idea!=0A=
=0A=
Yes, agree, actually, for RRC(fm10k), this configure is meaningless.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Michael =0A=
> Regards,=0A=
> Helin=0A=
>=0A=
>=0A=
=0A=