From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4CE9366 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 03:35:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 18:35:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,180,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="585703955" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 18:35:20 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.6) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:35:19 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:35:19 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.96]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.194]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:35:17 +0800 From: "Qiu, Michael" To: Neil Horman , Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog Thread-Index: AQHRB5K1+WDfX5i29EWaqsJMVTDP1Q== Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:35:17 +0000 Message-ID: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028621B50203@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13> <20151016142501.GA5602@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:35:21 -0000 On 2015/10/16 22:25, Neil Horman wrote:=0A= > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:45:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:=0A= >> 2015-10-15 14:44, Stephen Hemminger:=0A= >>> There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork.=0A= >>>=0A= >>> Thomas, could you start reducing that backlog?=0A= >> Yes=0A= >>=0A= >>> The simplest solution would be to merge some of the big patch series=0A= >>> from Intel for the base drivers, then reviewers can focus on the other= =0A= >>> patches.=0A= >> That's why having a drivers/net subtree would be useful.=0A= >>=0A= > Agreed, a dpdk-next tree would really be the solution here.=0A= =0A= Can't agree more :)=0A= =0A= Thanks,=0A= Michael=0A= > Neil=0A= >=0A= >=0A= =0A=