Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] support free hugepages

["Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>]

在 10/29/2014 1:49 PM, linhaifeng 写道:
> rte_eal_hugepage_free() is used for unlink all hugepages.If you want to
> free all hugepages you must make sure that you have stop to use it,and you
> must call this function before exit process.
>
> Signed-off-by: linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  .../lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h     | 11 ++++++++
>  .../lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c       | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> index 4cf8ea9..f6ad95f 100644
> --- a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> +++ b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,17 @@ unsigned rte_memory_get_nchannel(void);
>   */
>  unsigned rte_memory_get_nrank(void);
>  
> +/**
> + * Unlink all hugepages which created by dpdk.
> + *
> + * @param void
> + *
> + * @return
> + *       0: successfully
> + *       negative: error
> + */
> +int rte_eal_hugepage_free(void);
> +
>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
>  /**
>   * Return the physical address of elt, which is an element of the pool mp.
> diff --git a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> index f2454f4..109207c 100644
> --- a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> +++ b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@
>  #include "eal_filesystem.h"
>  #include "eal_hugepages.h"
>  
> +struct hugepage_table {
> +	struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl;
> +	unsigned nr_hugefiles;
> +};
> +
> +static struct hugepage_table g_hugepage_table;
> +
>  /**
>   * @file
>   * Huge page mapping under linux
> @@ -1202,6 +1209,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>  						(unsigned)
>  							(used_hp[i].hugepage_sz / 0x100000),
>  						j);
> +				g_hugepage_table.nr_hugefiles += used_hp[i].num_pages[j];
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -1237,6 +1245,8 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>  
> +	g_hugepage_table.hugepg_tbl = hugepage;
> +
>  	/* free the temporary hugepage table */
>  	free(tmp_hp);
>  	tmp_hp = NULL;
> @@ -1487,6 +1497,27 @@ error:
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> +int
> +rte_eal_hugepage_free(void)
> +{
> +	struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl = g_hugepage_table.hugepg_tbl;
> +	unsigned i;
> +	unsigned nr_hugefiles = g_hugepage_table.nr_hugefiles;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_hugefiles; i++) {
> +		ret = unlink(hugepg_tbl[i].filepath);
> +		if (ret != 0) {
> +			RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to unlink %s", hugepg_tbl[i].filepath);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va = NULL;

BTW, is it better to first set hugepg_tbl[i].orig_vato NULL, then unlink
filepath?
It may be not a good idea to first remove then set to NULL.

Thanks,
Michael

> +	}
> +
> +	RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "unlink %u hugepage files\n", nr_hugefiles);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  rte_eal_memdevice_init(void)
>  {