From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <8002onavi@gmail.com> Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DB95937 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 09:02:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q59so1466840wes.21 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 00:02:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EiWADS0RwnGtTGrizmEI0qrbDns4z/gln+7y7LjYbfA=; b=AHSM+EPfV3Ov2WU9mopGbwVr/IIWHhV6bXGVoxzFinerr3x9OW7pdgMXGpm1u/i7dh Qi7LxSvZ7vT4PRzggwx2DQYzpFS1p298M4PBlHnDnDMb8uO9sbqkGv4BY1FzPUsCeKWu iENmqLSdDObZ1nTLPjfcQcMv7YpBkfjDYVmMXIaSMF/EhfiFV5tUXl0TpCemhmHVxCCR 6SC9BoWEa+JnTZ/8jLJBKNdowg5qm0TA3FjkucKVU+oGFViFDydX+4stekNQ35+RZyH7 vvMRWGOAhmcK04rJtPSPIV4kWCxeEjMRwSbfTbXMK5hCjNnae1fAPJMh/ouj/xAY+EC/ n5WA== X-Received: by 10.180.14.196 with SMTP id r4mr3819025wic.2.1401433366575; Fri, 30 May 2014 00:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (e178191050.adsl.alicedsl.de. [85.178.191.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hr4sm7765290wjb.28.2014.05.30.00.02.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 May 2014 00:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53882D05.9040407@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:02:29 +0200 From: Ivano Cerrato <8002onavi@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org References: <53847C06.3060803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53847C06.3060803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] veth interfaces X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 07:02:35 -0000 Hello, I apologize for the imprecise email I sent, and now I try to be more specific about what I would like to do. I have a module that receives traffic from the network using DPDK and, based on the packet content, should provide packets to the proper Docker container. Docker containers receive packets through a veth interface. Can I use DPDK features, in particular the KNI, to send packets on a veth interface? If the KNI is not appropriate, is there something else that I could use? Regards, Ivano