Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test

[Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>]

Hi Pablo,

On 07/01/2014 10:59 AM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> I checked your patch, and I got this:
>
> ...
>
> EAL: Detected lcore 38 as core 11 on socket 1
> EAL: Detected lcore 39 as core 12 on socket 1
> EAL: Support maximum 64 logical core(s) by configuration.
> EAL: Detected 40 lcore(s)
> ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/test: unrecognized option '--prefix=whitelist'

I'm sorry, I cleaned the patch without retesting it, and I
introduced a bug in it (--prefix instead of --file-prefix).

Please find the new one as a reply to this mail.
When I test it, I get:

[...]
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba4c00000 (size = 0x200000)
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba4e00000 (size = 0x200000)
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba5000000 (size = 0x200000)
EAL: Requesting 984 pages of size 2MB from socket 0
EAL: Requesting 1000 pages of size 2MB from socket 1
EAL: TSC frequency is ~3333293 KHz
EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=ab9044e0)
PMD: Initializing pmd_ring for eth_ring
PMD: Error parsing device, invalid key <arg>
PMD: Ignoring unsupported parameters when creating rings-backed ethernet 
device
PMD: Creating rings-backed ethdev on numa socket 0

> Also, I thought we could not run two primary process at the same time
> (considering that the test app is a primary process).

Some other tests in the same file launch a primary process,
I suppose it should work if the prefix for huge-pages is different.

Regards,
Olivier