From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D3D333
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2014 14:00:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hi2so7216781wib.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=w1olCsN3VZ7TUVK2AhXnc/RAyAWVLcKDef2/5+hUsnY=;
 b=CMQhiCaCF3WJNd7m/mxgIbQ/QR5Iq23YlE061I9Vpm/68vw5v4ijRbEG2ehbwE4RKL
 59ycLI50/cS4XQVl14T/X6Q+/3MMK4sK4u26o0Hqhoadr4Df5x+1J7frHswsembBzhdt
 H/bXq6CGnnXrqi0WTlWVjmDfeeji8KNhFBk0mXpxAWN6Uv5z9wcMoDMDH1DD5vMcTu9s
 qHrWGDapPCS4h3BG+cp4NC5DRAm6aiCcbUZcWlXjxQ3mnWFTtBztzRnGogScN2WYhZOI
 BIu7sx3lPC6IJNvUtsoCauWfm4pc7gCi8hqzcnLMMEwCwbSHZjN+Ygw/hLAHAFwlcYKC
 0i1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYuTkcGZHkZmPF/fUWbVdJtiDC1+HMH81tStE2J+fPK04kOKS/Ca196vI2SEKwwTDz/c9e
X-Received: by 10.194.133.67 with SMTP id pa3mr2077108wjb.134.1404216066964;
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 05:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.0.195] (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm42568111wiw.22.2014.07.01.05.01.05
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 05:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53B2A2F8.4060901@6wind.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:00:56 +0200
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, 
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
References: <53B27D70.4090102@6wind.com>
 <1404206489-30703-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8971A797E1F@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8971A797E1F@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_flags
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:00:46 -0000

Hi Pablo,

On 07/01/2014 01:44 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> Thanks for this. It works fine :)

Thanks for testing!

> Actually, I am thinking of creating a separate test
> for vdev, out of whitelist test, as it has no relation with it. Do you agree on this?

I have no problem with that, it makes sense. Just to confirm: it means
that Thomas should not apply our previous patches from this thread and
wait for your next one, right?

Regards,
Olivier