From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lakerest.net (lakerest.net [162.235.35.161]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAFB68C0 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:04:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.1.1.132] ([10.1.1.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakerest.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s2R9ZYSA000180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 05:35:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rrs@lakerest.net) From: Randall Stewart Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:05:33 -0400 References: To: dev@dpdk.org Message-Id: <53DA1FDB-AAFF-4D99-A942-6E1B0033F477@lakerest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Subject: [dpdk-dev] Fwd: Attempting to get the DPDK to build for FreeBSD 9.2Release DPDK 1.6.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:04:01 -0000 >=20 > Hi all: >=20 > I have a stock 9.2Release FreeBSD system and am attempting to build = the DPDK for it. I have > followed the steps i.e: >=20 > 1) Gotten the ports in: > - dialog4ports > - gcc 4.8 > - gmake > - coreutils > - libexecinfo >=20 > 2) Ran the make=20 > - gmake install T=3Dx86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc CC=3Dgcc48 >=20 > It completes nicely and I have a x86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc directory = with all the goodies. > But here is the issue: >=20 > bash-fastone: cd x86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc/kmod/ > bash-fastone: su > Password: > root@fastone:/usr/randall/DPDK-1.6.0/x86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc/kmod # = ls > contigmem.ko nic_uio.ko > root@fastone:/usr/randall/DPDK-1.6.0/x86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc/kmod # = kldload ./contigmem.ko=20 > kldload: can't load ./contigmem.ko: Exec format error > root@fastone:/usr/randall/DPDK-1.6.0/x86_64-default-bsdapp-gcc/kmod #=20= >=20 >=20 >=20 > Anyone ever seen this? Per chance am I missing something? >=20 > I guess my next step is to see if I can build the klm=92s individually = with a more > BSDish setup to see if there is some sort of interaction going on here = between gcc and gcc48.. hmmm >=20 > Any pointers would be appreciated. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > R ------------------------------ Randall Stewart 803-317-4952 (cell)