From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com
 [74.125.82.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887CF683D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 11:20:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q58so5295979wes.35
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
 :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=ySWVq1njcI0fTMfi+Ha+q5gi7Rbbkrrn62NYVIq84fY=;
 b=LSj1Ho12X+2NvvJf/KPW7GyIiTZqh3bfXGmKCFPCOSzho18cSFhvfxUtCf0kV5rlMv
 BFrPCY0pTTyvYE3pIyNnwdr8SiyFnxGKRR+ksSkNR76iOyFC/vcPuAGsoOx3HBB4CHNm
 T7UPL03WVbbdSkU/9S8aI+Ywar7Ak3BHt5V3AeREnpk0UJ+hDfdFUtwhktcxkibYXdbm
 XyXy8afNQM3muJqSrRBswi45d61g4wkPNXd3wQwB+ftJeeQP7hluUvQ6isM66lNHQF43
 McAgnbL4/5IhF/Fp/0+v93GJvM0kBAQBLYYk/pGLKrAWoSDmWSBmOmQPICf34IBP9gMJ
 pDQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3yM3+5csXxvzxf8TVgytrDZN6cbxRuydydBtfcY6jbDyda+ZU21IJhyFJLKU5juD3dITz
X-Received: by 10.180.93.104 with SMTP id ct8mr2845170wib.30.1407489810830;
 Fri, 08 Aug 2014 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saturne.dev.6wind.com (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fe5sm16014048wjc.12.2014.08.08.02.23.29
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Fri, 08 Aug 2014 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53E49715.3020504@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:23:33 +0200
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Organization: www.6wind.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
References: <4099DE2E54AFAD489356C6C9161D533363BB3709@szxema505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
 <53E4802F.70904@6wind.com>
 <4099DE2E54AFAD489356C6C9161D533363BB4727@szxema505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4099DE2E54AFAD489356C6C9161D533363BB4727@szxema505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Guofeng \(E\)" <wind.guo@huawei.com>,
 "lixiao \(H\)" <lixiao91@huawei.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev]  Is VFIO driver's performance better than IGB_UIO?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:20:54 -0000

> My cpu is "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5620  @ 2.40GHz"

It is a Westmere if I am correct. So,use UIO.