From: Ivano Cerrato <8002onavi@gmail.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI Out of memory
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD9990.4050709@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I wrote a code that creates some KNI interfaces, destroys them when some
management events occur, and creates new interfaces when other
management events happen.
What happens is that I create a number of interfaces using "kni_alloc",
I destroy ALL of them through "kni_release" and, when I try to create a
new one I get the message "KNI out of memory" during the execution of
the "kni_alloc".
The number of interfaces that I can create/destroy before getting the
error depends on the size of the mempool that I specify during the
creation of the interfaces themselves.
Then, to me it seems that the memory is not properly released when a KNI
interface is destroyed. Before invoking "kni_release", I drain all the
remaining mbufs in the tx queues. While checking the sources of DPDK, I
have seen that indeed this trace only appears when there there are no
mbufs available in the mempool.
Am I missing something here? Is there any other call necessary to
properly release a KNI interface?
Just before/after the creation and release of an interface, I print the
values obtained by invoking "rte_mempool_count" and
"rte_mempool_free_count" on the mempool used for the KNI. What I get is
the following: the value obtained with "rte_mempool_count" tends to
decrease, while the value get with "rte_mempool_free_count" tends to
increase.
What is the exact semantic of "rte_mempool_count" and
"rte_mempool_free_count"? From the doxygen documentation, it seems that
the behaviour should be the opposite.
Best regards,
Ivano
reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FD9990.4050709@gmail.com \
--to=8002onavi@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).