DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivano Cerrato <8002onavi@gmail.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI Out of memory
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:40:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD9990.4050709@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,
I wrote a code that creates some KNI interfaces, destroys them when some 
management events occur, and creates new interfaces when other 
management events happen.
What happens is that I create a number of interfaces using "kni_alloc", 
I destroy ALL of them through "kni_release" and, when I try to create a 
new one I get the message "KNI out of memory" during the execution of 
the "kni_alloc".

The number of interfaces that I can create/destroy before getting the 
error depends on the size of the mempool that I specify during the 
creation of the interfaces themselves.
Then, to me it seems that the memory is not properly released when a KNI 
interface is destroyed. Before invoking "kni_release", I drain all the 
remaining mbufs in the tx queues. While checking the sources of DPDK, I 
have seen that indeed this trace only appears when there there are no 
mbufs available in the mempool.

Am I missing something here?  Is there any other call necessary to 
properly release a KNI interface?

Just before/after the creation and release of an interface, I print the 
values obtained by invoking "rte_mempool_count" and 
"rte_mempool_free_count" on the mempool used for the KNI. What I get is 
the following: the value obtained with "rte_mempool_count" tends to 
decrease, while the value get with "rte_mempool_free_count" tends to 
increase.

What is the exact semantic of "rte_mempool_count" and 
"rte_mempool_free_count"? From the doxygen documentation, it seems that 
the behaviour should be the opposite.

Best regards,

  Ivano

                 reply	other threads:[~2014-08-27  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FD9990.4050709@gmail.com \
    --to=8002onavi@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).