From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B231396 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 02:19:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so162829055wmu.0 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:19:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=3+xGdW08uRJjFBnu6FugUEBBZlc3FR2wAiCaieW/GmA=; b=BvfSM79q58HsvPy1z2hSr6qjXC/Z1E3DE5UZ32PbpPhP++QfpXm7lHYtjZLf3pb31F QgQBdxRyr1hbibYe8yKAcoUmuWy98PHKg+EbeElVuCrMgBTnscRwjROq32k8MlU9iu+2 sktAU3yH+X3OWjR4JRu2+ngA5id6UK1Fe5nywVefT4uDv6fyJ6lOi/f8Had6M76IDDhO 8rL+Hj3jYCjUcCL5nxbC1MUJafHhMpJkmvuYXSPOjNhkrnpwZf+JQslHv3F1V+KkVY8p Oj0S9PvNdsbfehAC9Ue8ODW0pRIiCrAysrcSSSa55QTHleoWfF8ZnNHmId/LjQTxupFE 4L/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=3+xGdW08uRJjFBnu6FugUEBBZlc3FR2wAiCaieW/GmA=; b=YU8TOJFJqJOaLHWpAvRsqtoYnO9Jliht8XP92JLMfg2SY5fYP3hjxLw8a/jVbVoYe3 l3BhZuTfDa1haQsrZ2q1sxWxyQCKzaJIAACXRg+MhZ9HGNtrU49XLJtPGSmqQ7D+08WA woC+fVv223OI83Wn6kVUYJ1jPP6weTpUFnvG4rf4JfU2YlKGNHayAg2hNOAtFZqXA7Ft iInuddWAZyQlXfDt9PJsISrhc2A7qjT+uA6i2qocjBd9DnTIa7MXu++eNiso0Bej6THf 77yXarGRG0cNEthj6BehGSzMsPAjHvaVUpqIl17GTQjit7n8wDS/tB63ofubUL3ZfZJc Q5vw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnq/vg+I5/y7buPpOr5h88zcnVudg6baKOyKQPx95/kU+fTuTrQNYJlpJpqm7gHrogfm95/4Kc8uZEBcky646GhbJMp+g== X-Received: by 10.194.58.105 with SMTP id p9mr678115wjq.91.1449537573150; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:19:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm624573wja.6.2015.12.07.17.19.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:19:32 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jianbo Liu Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:18:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5439330.ZDtZO93Tq2@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1449154976-16501-3-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> References: <1448995276-9599-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1449154976-16501-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1449154976-16501-3-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] eal/acl: enable acl for armv7-a X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 01:19:33 -0000 2015-12-03 23:02, Jianbo Liu: > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64),y) > +ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM) $(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64)),) [...] > +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_ARM > +/* NEON intrinsic vqtbl1q_u8() is not supported in ARMv7-A(AArch32) */ I'm convinced there is a good reason why ARMv8 is also called ARCH_ARM64, and ARMv7 may be called AArch32 or ARCH_ARM. But I don't know why? Is ARCH_ARM32 or ARCH_ARMv7 too simple? Is it possible to have a 32-bit ARMv8?