From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx.bisdn.de (mx.bisdn.de [185.27.182.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586D12A9 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.43] (42.Red-79-146-253.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.146.253.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.bisdn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E848A2DA9; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:14:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54462403.3060107@bisdn.de> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:14:43 +0200 From: Marc Sune User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Monjalon References: <544617E0.80502@bisdn.de> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0344210F9@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> <39275062.2hPoVIfNVy@xps13> In-Reply-To: <39275062.2hPoVIfNVy@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] development/integration branch? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:06:04 -0000 On 21/10/14 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > My balance is different because I have a simpler solution for Marc's problem: > git fetch && git merge $(git tag | grep -v -- -rc | tail -n1) Thomas, We all know we _can_ do this. But is it really necessary? We should be all as lazy as possible and make it easy for users IMHO. `git pull` is easier :) I don't see any drawback of using a development branch, except if you consider the extra push to master per release a drawback. Also think about new users downloading the repo for the first time. They are forced to do this right now if they want to checkout the latest stable. marc