DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Sune <marc.sune@bisdn.de>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] KNI: use a memzone pool for KNI alloc/release
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:52:12 +0200
Message-ID: <54463ADC.8080901@bisdn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11046523.OQamTbecJT@xps13>


v5: commit message arranged, all warnings from checkpatch.pl fixed except:

WARNING: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#104: FILE: lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c:62:
+#define KNI_MEM_CHECK(cond) do { if (cond) goto kni_fail; } while (0)

a) This MACRO was there before, I just re-factored it to make it more 
b) There are 4 lines exceeding 80cols due to long quoted strings. I 
followed kernel convention not to split them in multiple lines.

Thanks and regards

On 21/10/14 10:29, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 2014-10-18 00:51, Marc Sune:
>> This patch implements the KNI memzone pool in order to prevent
>> memzone exhaustion when allocating/deallocating KNI interfaces.
>> It adds a new API call, rte_kni_init(max_kni_ifaces) that shall
>> be called before any call to rte_kni_alloc() if KNI is used.
>> v2: Moved KNI fd opening to rte_kni_init(). Revised style.
>> v3: Adapted kni examples/tests to rte_kni_init().
>> v4: Improved example integration. Fixed kni_memzone_pool_alloc/release() bug.
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Sune <marc.sune@bisdn.de>
> Thanks for the good work with Helin.
> Before applying this patch, I'd like another version explaining in the
> commit log why this change is needed.
> And please use to checkpatch.pl to check and remove whitespace errors.
> Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-21 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-17 22:51 Marc Sune
2014-10-21  4:57 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-10-21  8:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-21 10:52   ` Marc Sune [this message]
2014-10-22  5:51     ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-10-22  7:10       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] KNI: fix compilation warning 'missing-field-initializers' Marc Sune
2014-10-22  7:14         ` Marc Sune
2014-10-22  8:11         ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-10-22  8:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-22  8:42           ` Marc Sune
2014-10-22  8:50             ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-22  9:49               ` Marc Sune
2014-10-22  9:59                 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-10-22 10:00                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-22 10:23                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Marc Sune
2014-10-22 10:35                     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54463ADC.8080901@bisdn.de \
    --to=marc.sune@bisdn.de \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git