From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nico@emutex.com>
Received: from smtp.digiweb.ie (smtp2.digiweb.ie [83.147.160.14])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4B84A6E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  7 Nov 2014 15:52:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from statler.emutex.com (unknown [92.51.199.138])
 by smtp.digiweb.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336FB2900FE;
 Fri,  7 Nov 2014 15:01:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.10.64.102]
 by statler.emutex.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nico@emutex.com>)
 id 1Xml2c-0001BW-VL; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:01:35 +0000
Message-ID: <545CDEC3.7090308@emutex.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:01:23 +0000
From: Nicolas Pernas Maradei <nico@emutex.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <545CBCE0.2030806@emutex.com>
 <20141107140201.GE25469@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <545CD710.4040406@emutex.com> <1697795.zFSsGeXbRQ@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <1697795.zFSsGeXbRQ@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] White listing a virtual device
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:52:52 -0000

On 07/11/14 14:57, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> OK, now I better understand your need.
> I think that your use case was simply forgotten when designing the
> new behaviour.
> Could you prepare a patch for this need?
> Or maybe you could workaround with a script based on lspci to blacklist all
> network devices?

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your reply. That explains it then. I'll try to put a patch 
together the following week.

Thanks,
Nico.