From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.192.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F182E89
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:45:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p10so7407292pdj.19
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:55:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=LMSFTZFtnT5KU7QxsXFjwUN7EmD/qwHYgDde3WJtUQU=;
 b=BPMAa9XNMhOUh3st5VWl65F/J2aIPJ5Aw6RJ0RHjgby8AthAq4G2/1hVKhU9kq84bE
 WQ0ud/rtZAJws73SEzy28YrzL7vJ+BJTiSOyJA50sslc7r2UBKCqQ97gEI9iLJu5q9NT
 FQksSNsDMJ3OlU+UTTltNepvLp9u7sk+hThTzKuMh83Oig8kcQ1eDKnvFefgt7UdKQ38
 Qyb1kmOtn+wiiZtclNrQwOg7Y9wwy7rNOoH3A2nlO1xLp+LALmyMpv6uKEmd8/nMdzb+
 O+/CVcS0ZFF1X3v98uces0/EpVam8nan9kTVVodYldwjBHj7xkDISeWJSvNcZyrK2Vtq
 MoSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlswU+sjXrjpkGNxcHvK+/lgQuDHKnaqb21T4iTG1I9bAVkigZO6Fk2S+uuwhaIvYNBkCJj
X-Received: by 10.68.68.235 with SMTP id z11mr30117800pbt.102.1415609736854;
 Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.129.101] (napt.igel.co.jp. [219.106.231.132])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mp5sm15866400pbc.33.2014.11.10.00.55.34
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54607D86.4020901@igel.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:55:34 +0900
From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
References: <1415272471-3299-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1415272471-3299-8-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2E4D05@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <54604900.7070105@igel.co.jp>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2F001E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2F001E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
 "masutani.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp" <masutani.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 7/7] lib/librte_vhost: Add vhost-user
	implementation
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:45:53 -0000

Hi Xie,

(2014/11/10 17:18), Xie, Huawei wrote:
> Tetsuya:
> I already did this, :), and will publish the code for review after I do=
 some cleanup next week.

I appreciate it.
I guess your implementation assumes that all vhost-user functions you imp=
lemented are called
by virtio common layer. Is it right?

If so, I will change abstraction layer implementation by this week or ear=
ly next week.
(Please also check email related with 'get_virtio_net_callbacks()').

Thanks,
Tetsuya