From: Jincheng Miao <jmiao@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] igb_uio: compatible with upstream longterm kernel and RHEL6
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:13:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54782EB5.7060409@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7579030.6nSHmmQ36o@xps13>
On 11/28/2014 01:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2014-10-31 15:37, Jincheng Miao:
>> Function pci_num_vf() is introduced from upstream linux-2.6.34. So
>> this patch make compatible with longterm kernel linux-2.6.32.63.
>>
>> For RHEL6's kernel, although it is based on linux-2.6.32, it has
>> pci_num_vf() implementation. As the same with commit 11ba0426,
>> pci_num_vf() is defined from RHEL6. So we should check the macro
>> RHEL_RELEASE_CODE to consider this situation.
> Please, could you explain in which case CONFIG_PCI_IOV is defined?
> The logic is a bit difficult to understand.
Yep, there is a little confusion for pci_num_vf():
1. it is available when CONFIG_PCI_IOV is defined.
2. it is introduced from upstream kernel v2.6.34 (fb8a0d9)
3. it is implemented from RHEL6.0, although the kernel version is 2.6.32.
The logic of this patch is:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 34) && \
(!(defined(RHEL_RELEASE_CODE) && RHEL_RELEASE_CODE >=
RHEL_RELEASE_VERSION(6, 0) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)))
Firstly it detects kernel version, if it is less than 2.6.34, and it is
not RHEL-specified, then define pci_num_vf().
Secondly, it deals with RHEL-specified. If it is RHEL6.0 or later, and
CONFIG_PCI_IOV is defined. we should not define pci_num_vf(). If any of
these conditions is not reached, pci_num_vf() should be defined.
Some days ago, I setup dpdk for longterm kernel 2.6.32.63, and got error:
```
CC [M]
/root/dpdk-source/build/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.o
/root/dpdk-source/build/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c:
In function ‘show_max_vfs’:
/root/dpdk-source/build/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c:75:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘pci_num_vf’
```
This problem is introduced by commit 11ba04265
commit 11ba04265cfd2a53c12c030fcaa5dfe7eed39a42
Author: Guillaume Gaudonville <guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com>
Date: Wed Sep 3 10:18:23 2014 +0200
igb_uio: fix build on RHEL 6.3
- pci_num_vf() is already defined in RHEL 6
- pci_intx_mask_supported is already defined in RHEL 6.3
- pci_check_and_mask_intx is already defined in RHEL 6.3
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Gaudonville <guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 34) && \
+ !defined(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)
That is because longterm kernel 2.6.32.63 defined CONFIG_PCI_IOV, but it
lacks pci_num_vf(),
after above processing, pci_num_vf() is still not existed, then build fail.
My patch could work around it, and can deal with RHEL-specified kernel.
>> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 34) && \
>> - !defined(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)
>> + (!(defined(RHEL_RELEASE_CODE) && \
>> + RHEL_RELEASE_CODE >= RHEL_RELEASE_VERSION(6, 0) && \
>> + defined(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)))
>>
>> static int pci_num_vf(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 7:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] compatibility fallback and replacement of kernel function invoking Jincheng Miao
2014-10-31 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] igb_uio: compatible with upstream longterm kernel and RHEL6 Jincheng Miao
2014-11-27 17:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-28 8:13 ` Jincheng Miao [this message]
2014-11-28 16:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-02 4:01 ` Jincheng Miao
2014-10-31 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: replace strict_strtoul with kstrtoul Jincheng Miao
2014-11-28 16:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54782EB5.7060409@redhat.com \
--to=jmiao@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).