DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mbuf:add three TX offload flags and change three fields
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:36:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54784232.8030707@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417107801-9544-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>

Hi Jijiang,

On 11/27/2014 06:03 PM, Jijiang Liu wrote:
>  /** Tell the NIC it's an IPv4 packet. Required for L4 checksum offload or TSO. */
>  #define PKT_TX_IPV4          PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR
>  
>  /** Tell the NIC it's an IPv6 packet. Required for L4 checksum offload or TSO. */
>  #define PKT_TX_IPV6          PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR

The description still does not match what we discussed. Either we
have PKT_TX_IPV4 meaning "packet is IPv4 without requiring IP cksum
offload", or  "packet is IPv4". I prefer the second one, but whatever
the choice is, the comments must be coherent.

> -#define PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT      (1ULL << 55) /**< TX packet is a 802.1q VLAN packet. */
> +/** Outer IP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC for tunneling packet */
> +#define PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM   (1ULL << 58)
> +
> +/** Tell the NIC it's an outer IPv6 packet for tunneling packet.*/
> +#define PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6    (1ULL << 59)

I think we should have the same flags with the same meanings for
inner and outer:

- PKT_TX_IPV4, PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_IPV6
- PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4, PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6

In your patch there is no PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 flag.

Regards,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-27 17:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mbuf:add three TX offload flags and change three fields Jijiang Liu
2014-11-28  9:36   ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2014-11-28 10:27     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-28 10:33     ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-28 10:40       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-28 11:00         ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 11:13           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-28 11:18             ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 15:46               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] mbuf:change PKT_TX_IPV4 and PKT_TX_IPV6 definition Jijiang Liu
2014-11-28  9:37   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] i40e:PMD change for VXLAN TX checksum Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 17:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] testpmd:rework csum forward engine Jijiang Liu
2014-11-28  9:50   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 10:10     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-27 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54784232.8030707@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).