From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547EF6E9.5040000@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417532767-1309-3-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Hi Jijiang,
On 12/02/2014 04:06 PM, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> Replace PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM with PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT in order to indicate a packet is an UDP tunneling packet, and introduce 3 TX offload flags for outer IP TX checksum, which are PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 and PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 respectively;Rework csum forward engine and i40e PMD due to these changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 9 +++++++--
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 7 ++++++-
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> index d8c080a..9094967 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ process_outer_cksums(void *outer_l3_hdr, uint16_t outer_ethertype,
> uint64_t ol_flags = 0;
>
> if (testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_CKSUM)
> - ol_flags |= PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM;
> + ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT;
>
> if (outer_ethertype == _htons(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4)) {
> ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
> @@ -470,7 +470,12 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> { PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> { PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> { PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> - { PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM, PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM },
> + { PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT, PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT },
> + { PKT_TX_IPV4, PKT_TX_IPV4 },
> + { PKT_TX_IPV6, PKT_TX_IPV6 },
> + { PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM },
> + { PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 },
> + { PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 },
> { PKT_TX_TCP_SEG, PKT_TX_TCP_SEG },
I still think having a flag IPV4 + another flag IP_CHECKSUM is not
appropriate. I though Konstantin agreed on other flags, but I may
have misunderstood:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/009070.html
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 15:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Jijiang Liu
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] mbuf:redefine three TX ol_flags Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:35 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:41 ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2014-12-03 12:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-03 14:41 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 2:08 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 10:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 10:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-04 11:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 13:51 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 22:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 4:17 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 6:52 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-04 7:52 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 10:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 13:47 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 21:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 1:15 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-05 11:11 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] mbuf:replace the inner_l2_len and the inner_l3_len fields Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:45 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-05 11:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 16:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-07 11:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547EF6E9.5040000@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).