From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D395A06 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 10:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r20so2534328wiv.0 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 01:37:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=I7r4iF3LM3LOC1OKgjsApZrGqU3iQD2yfi1vyTU8sPg=; b=QkM/MZflNmyMIkVU0RSoKvQHUeAz7qMIgOWGgBuj+29gBO81F1iLpY79PLSDL92ry2 4wNSml2ASizzGpSQvq58nP7EnhZZFWXPFwQveZBhOmyJrGN0NBFM/zT/pAZM6o7BWtCh oXp17WhnUb+IbAENrFjJKGS8oS6Mjy3dvgHNyUsPPHnvkrcHF7MApxXIbPUbo0V3uiyI HnjE3/ixx1sbG2zYsWotuhvsYBc1eQfrgemO6OKtOQC9hPRKd2sSJmpRU821DuB+Wrh6 kxocE826xxmZQVAYTd5nKQPO+BYqak8uV+ETrNqxmvdYf0xVW5G7ESuOOpbQgN0FMgsv gGIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk66sMKpvsG5HfF3CRarmpn09HVguecRzU6l0Vrl2+zQy57H3f/oMXk2tHSIYyAAlxaFOjO X-Received: by 10.194.81.1 with SMTP id v1mr169246057wjx.50.1420364266377; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 01:37:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (bzq-79-179-0-199.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.0.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ww4sm50704196wjc.47.2015.01.04.01.37.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jan 2015 01:37:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54A909E7.3090901@cloudius-systems.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 11:37:43 +0200 From: Vlad Zolotarov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ouyang, Changchun" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1419398584-19520-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <1420355937-18484-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <1420355937-18484-3-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <54A8F93F.4080402@cloudius-systems.com> <54A8FA23.1090802@cloudius-systems.com> <54A8FC66.8070109@cloudius-systems.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] ixgbe: Negotiate VF API version X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 09:37:46 -0000 On 01/04/15 10:51, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com] >> Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 4:40 PM >> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] ixgbe: Negotiate VF API version >> >> >> On 01/04/15 10:37, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: >>> Hi Vlad, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com] >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 4:30 PM >>>> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev@dpdk.org >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] ixgbe: Negotiate VF API >>>> version >>>> >>>> >>>> On 01/04/15 10:26, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: >>>>> On 01/04/15 09:18, Ouyang Changchun wrote: >>>>>> Negotiate API version with VF when receiving the >>>>>> IXGBE_VF_API_NEGOTIATE message. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang >>>>> Reviewed-by: Vlad Zolotarov >>> Thanks for your reviewing. >>> >>>> One small remark below. >>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 1 + >>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c | 25 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h >>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h >>>>>> index ca99170..730098d 100644 >>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h >>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h >>>>>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ struct ixgbe_vf_info { >>>>>> uint16_t tx_rate[IXGBE_MAX_QUEUE_NUM_PER_VF]; >>>>>> uint16_t vlan_count; >>>>>> uint8_t spoofchk_enabled; >>>>>> + uint8_t api_version; >>>>>> }; >>>>>> /* >>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c >>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c index 51da1fd..495aff5 100644 >>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c >>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c >>>>>> @@ -469,6 +469,28 @@ ixgbe_set_vf_lpe(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, >>>>>> __rte_unused uint32_t vf, uint32_t *ms >>>>>> } >>>>>> static int >>>>>> +ixgbe_negotiate_vf_api(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint32_t vf, >>>>>> uint32_t *msgbuf) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + uint32_t api_version = msgbuf[1]; >>>>>> + struct ixgbe_vf_info *vfinfo = >>>>>> +*IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_P_VFDATA(dev->data->dev_private); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + switch (api_version) { >>>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_10: >>>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_11: >>>> Why version 2.0 is not negotiated? >>>> >>> Because it doesn't fully support 2.0 features yet. >> Well, it that case u should not support 2.0 in patch 3 as well. > My opinion is that In patch 3, ixgbe_get_vf_queues need api_11 or api_20 to support it, > That mean the feature require those 2 api version, and it can't work with lower version like api_10. > Here the code show the pf has the capability of supporting api_10 and api_11, > I think it doesn't contradict. After a second pass on this code and code in PATCH3 I agree that it's ok. > Thanks > Changchun >