From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A27658FF for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:33:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y839g-0002NM-I3; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:36:59 +0100 Message-ID: <54AA4C4B.3020907@6wind.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:33:15 +0100 From: Olivier MATZ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gal Sagie , "" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] IPv6 Offload Capabilities X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 08:33:30 -0000 Hello, On 01/05/2015 08:56 AM, Gal Sagie wrote: > I noticed that in version 1.8, there are no flags to indicate IPv6 check > sum offloading > (only DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM) There is no L3 checksum field in IPv6 header, that's why there is no DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV6_CKSUM flag. > which means TSO offloading is also not supported for IPv6. TSO is supported for IPv6. Please see the test report sent on the mailing list: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007991.html Regards, Olivier