From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F06F5A31 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:32:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml430-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGB50133; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:32:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.19.115) by szxeml430-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.185) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:32:03 +0800 Message-ID: <54C08B54.50700@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:32:04 +0800 From: Linhaifeng User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Hall References: <54C070DF.1050006@huawei.com> <20150122044531.GA13230@mhcomputing.net> In-Reply-To: <20150122044531.GA13230@mhcomputing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.19.115] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] some questions about rte_memcpy X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:32:28 -0000 On 2015/1/22 12:45, Matthew Hall wrote: > One theory. Many DPDK functions crash if they are called before rte_eal_init() > is called. So perhaps this could be a cause, since that won't have been called > when working on a constant Hi, Matthew Thank you for your response. Do you mean if call rte_memcpy before rte_eal_init() would crash?why? -- Regards, Haifeng