From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998CD255 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:08:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fb4so11046415wid.2 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:08:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yq3gVCE8C8b8KYKJ4q7uHqNzBhNccrz+5Q/Ctl9vJNc=; b=O2rR9OWwP5DRVNqJMByG+dfa1qRZpsSZyBd51vhm/WAfWfNRmID8AhWSiO+Fh8CAsz MorHTGtCa7pNLxnj1czEn6gZb+pEIGi4nJi+uRbM5yZo0bwE70RYhJR1yp9qRRYJY/Zs AVcvmVoatcXDnYgSESHHHoB4XWFXwVfINnahKYJch2FjLTwhl9Pc6fvIacdFh1XURPhU 6h/fiHwdhaNtqZ5ZR/6hFWKzzvKN48PEvPqLJxRLdLgZHYwx/H7eO/t8LG2RSF+MdjOU zbsHFcynXzsVOTBYIWapt9EhGD8XbxNv9WRglP6W0oRS79Hdw64YZ+Aomjvv/Punqw4P eFWg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmkbb/KmJQmArHI//C+1Rx6qclbP81yVb4wE9PGyqYiIwob+PpwW9jIEjOQ9fjui2ACZuEp X-Received: by 10.180.198.209 with SMTP id je17mr4488962wic.17.1422443295464; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.16.0.195] (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id et4sm5605565wjd.15.2015.01.28.03.08.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:08:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C8C31C.5020007@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:08:12 +0100 From: Olivier MATZ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cao, Min" , "Liu, Jijiang" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1422243805-10906-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Support NVGRE on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:08:15 -0000 Hi Min, On 01/27/2015 06:46 AM, Cao, Min wrote: > Test by: min.cao > Patch name: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Support NVGRE on i40e > Test Flag: Tested-by > Tester name: min.cao@intel.com > Result summary: total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed > > Test Case 1: > Name: nvgre filter > Environment: OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 > gcc (GCC) 4.8.2 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz > NIC: Fortville eagle > [...] Just one remarq about your test report: it's quite useful to have such reports, showing that a feature is tested. However, I think it would be much better if you provide all the means to reproduce the test (testpmd configuration, scripts to generate packets, ...). For instance, this could help people wanting to implement the same on another PMD to validate with the same test plan than yours. Regards, Olivier