From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412299AAB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Feb 2015 08:35:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com)
 ([172.24.2.119])
 by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
 with ESMTP id CJA00911; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:35:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.19.115) by szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com
 (10.82.67.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 3 Feb 2015
 15:35:04 +0800
Message-ID: <54D07A25.2060809@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:35:01 +0800
From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dpd >> dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "ms >> Michael S. Tsirkin"
 <mst@redhat.com>
References: <54C744D9.3060900@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <54C744D9.3060900@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.177.19.115]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: liuyongan@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vhost: virtio-net rx-ring stop work after work many
 hours, bug?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 07:35:24 -0000

I found that the new code had try to notify guest after send each packet after 2bbb811.
So this bug not exist now.

static inline uint32_t __attribute__((always_inline)) virtio_dev_merge_rx(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
	struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count) {
	... ...

	for (pkt_idx = 0; pkt_idx < count; pkt_idx++) {

		... ...

		/* Kick the guest if necessary. */
		if (!(vq->avail->flags & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT))
			eventfd_write((int)vq->kickfd, 1);
	}

	return count;
}

thank you very much!

On 2015/1/27 15:57, Linhaifeng wrote:
> Hi,all
> 
> I use vhost-user to send data to VM at first it cant work well but after many hours VM can not receive data but can send data.
> 
> (gdb)p avail_idx
> $4 = 2668
> (gdb)p free_entries
> $5 = 0
> (gdb)l
>         /* check that we have enough buffers */
>         if (unlikely(count > free_entries))
>             count = free_entries;
> 
>         if (count == 0){
>             int b=0;
>             if(b) { // when set b=1 to notify guest rx_ring will restart to work
>                 if (!(vq->avail->flags & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
> 
>                     eventfd_write(vq->callfd, 1);
>                 }
>             }
>             return 0;
>         }
> 
> some info i print in guest:
> 
> net eth3:vi->num=199
> net eth3:rvq info: num_free=57, used->idx=2668, avail->idx=2668
> net eth3:svq info: num_free=254, used->idx=1644, avail->idx=1644
> 
> net eth3:vi->num=199
> net eth3:rvq info: num_free=57, used->idx=2668, avail->idx=2668
> net eth3:svq info: num_free=254, used->idx=1645, avail->idx=1645
> 
> net eth3:vi->num=199
> net eth3:rvq info: num_free=57, used->idx=2668, avail->idx=2668
> net eth3:svq info: num_free=254, used->idx=1646, avail->idx=1646
> 
> # free
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:      3924100      337252    3586848          0      95984     138060
> -/+ buffers/cache:     103208    3820892
> Swap:       970748          0     970748
> 
> I have two questions:
> 1.Should we need to notify guest when there is no buffer in vq->avail?
> 2.Why virtio_net stop to fill avail?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Haifeng