From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Build failure on FreeBSD-10.1-RELEASE
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:34:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F67D33.6010104@igel.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302102225.GB8520@bricha3-MOBL3>
On 2015/03/02 19:22, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 12:47:42PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got a error while building master branch on FreeBSD.
>> Here is a log.
>>
>> $ gmake T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang config
>> cc: error: unknown argument: '-fdirectives-only'
>> cp: /usr/home/mukawa/work/dpdk/build/.config_tmp: No such file or directory
>> cp: /usr/home/mukawa/work/dpdk/build/.config_tmp: No such file or directory
>> gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for 'depdirs'.
>> Configuration done
>>
>>
>> Here is log came from 'uname'
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> FreeBSD eris.hq.igel.co.jp 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401:
>> Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014
>>
>>
>> I've tried to remove '-fdirectives-only' from mk/rte.sdkconfig.mk like
>> below.
>> With the fixing, It seems I can compile and run testpmd.
>> (Obviously, we should not merge below patch, but I've done just for testing)
>>
>> diff --git a/mk/rte.sdkconfig.mk b/mk/rte.sdkconfig.mk
>> index d43c430..f8d95b1 100644
>> --- a/mk/rte.sdkconfig.mk
>> +++ b/mk/rte.sdkconfig.mk
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ else
>> $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config: $(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE) FORCE | $(RTE_OUTPUT)
>> $(Q)if [ "$(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE)" != "" -a -f
>> "$(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE)" ]; then \
>> $(CPP) -undef -P -x assembler-with-cpp \
>> - -fdirectives-only -ffreestanding \
>> + -ffreestanding \
>> -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config_tmp $(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE) ; \
>> if ! cmp -s $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config_tmp
>> $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config; then \
>> cp $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config_tmp
>> $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config ; \
>>
>>
>> Also, I've checked /usr/ports/net/dpdk, and found below line.
>> (It seems above ports dpdk package is based on DPDK-1.8.)
>>
>>
>> $(CPP) -undef -P -x assembler-with-cpp \
>> -ffreestanding \
>> -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/.config_tmp $(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE) ; \
>>
>> So, I guess we should not add '-fdirectives-only' for flags of $(CPP)
>> for BSD system like dpdk package of ports.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tetsuya
>>
> Yes, that is correct. In most cases I have tested, the extra flag only gives a
> warning but it appears its now an error. We should conditionally include or
> omit the flag for BSD vs Linux, I think.
>
> /Bruce
Hi Bruce,
It seems we cannot use CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP/BSDAPP definition here.
Now I am looking for other way to check target OS.
Is it not so good to use $(T) definition value here?
Thanks,
Tetsuya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 3:47 Tetsuya Mukawa
2015-03-02 10:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 3:34 ` Tetsuya Mukawa [this message]
2015-03-04 9:33 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-03-04 10:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-05 7:08 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2015-03-05 19:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F67D33.6010104@igel.co.jp \
--to=mukawa@igel.co.jp \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).