From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: use library routines instead of local copies
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:46:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551437D6.80503@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821407936@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 26/03/15 01:20, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:43 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zoltan Kiss
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: use library routines instead of local copies
>>
>> This macro and function were copies from the mbuf library, no reason to keep
>> them.
>
> NACK
> You can't use RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT macro here.
> If you'll look at vhost code carefully, you'll realise that we don't use standard rte_pktmbuf_attach() here.
> As we attach mbuf not to another mbuf but to external memory buffer, passed to us by virtio device.
> Look at attach_rxmbuf_zcp().
Yes, I think the proper fix is to set the flag in attach_rxmbuf_zcp()
and virtio_tx_route_zcp(), then you can use the library macro here.
> Though I suppose, we can replace pktmbuf_detach_zcp() , with rte_pktmbuf_detach() - they are doing identical things.
Yes, the only difference is that the latter do "m->ol_flags = 0" as well.
> BTW, I wonder did you ever test your patch?
Indeed I did not, shame on me. I don't have a KVM setup at hand. This
fix were born as a side effect of the cleaning up in the library,
and I'm afraid I don't have the time right now to create a KVM setup.
Could anyone who has it at hand help out to run a quick test? (for the
v2 of this patch, which I'll send in shortly)
Regards,
Zoltan
> My guess it would cause vhost with '--zero-copy' to crash or corrupt the packets straightway.
>
> Konstantin
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> examples/vhost/main.c | 38 +++++---------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/vhost/main.c b/examples/vhost/main.c
>> index c3fcb80..1c998a5 100644
>> --- a/examples/vhost/main.c
>> +++ b/examples/vhost/main.c
>> @@ -139,8 +139,6 @@
>> /* Number of descriptors per cacheline. */
>> #define DESC_PER_CACHELINE (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(struct vring_desc))
>>
>> -#define MBUF_EXT_MEM(mb) (RTE_MBUF_FROM_BADDR((mb)->buf_addr) != (mb))
>> -
>> /* mask of enabled ports */
>> static uint32_t enabled_port_mask = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1538,32 +1536,6 @@ attach_rxmbuf_zcp(struct virtio_net *dev)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Detach an attched packet mbuf -
>> - * - restore original mbuf address and length values.
>> - * - reset pktmbuf data and data_len to their default values.
>> - * All other fields of the given packet mbuf will be left intact.
>> - *
>> - * @param m
>> - * The attached packet mbuf.
>> - */
>> -static inline void pktmbuf_detach_zcp(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>> -{
>> - const struct rte_mempool *mp = m->pool;
>> - void *buf = RTE_MBUF_TO_BADDR(m);
>> - uint32_t buf_ofs;
>> - uint32_t buf_len = mp->elt_size - sizeof(*m);
>> - m->buf_physaddr = rte_mempool_virt2phy(mp, m) + sizeof(*m);
>> -
>> - m->buf_addr = buf;
>> - m->buf_len = (uint16_t)buf_len;
>> -
>> - buf_ofs = (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM <= m->buf_len) ?
>> - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM : m->buf_len;
>> - m->data_off = buf_ofs;
>> -
>> - m->data_len = 0;
>> -}
>>
>> /*
>> * This function is called after packets have been transimited. It fetchs mbuf
>> @@ -1590,8 +1562,8 @@ txmbuf_clean_zcp(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vpool *vpool)
>>
>> for (index = 0; index < mbuf_count; index++) {
>> mbuf = __rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(vpool->pool);
>> - if (likely(MBUF_EXT_MEM(mbuf)))
>> - pktmbuf_detach_zcp(mbuf);
>> + if (likely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(mbuf)))
>> + rte_pktmbuf_detach(mbuf);
>> rte_ring_sp_enqueue(vpool->ring, mbuf);
>>
>> /* Update used index buffer information. */
>> @@ -1653,8 +1625,8 @@ static void mbuf_destroy_zcp(struct vpool *vpool)
>> for (index = 0; index < mbuf_count; index++) {
>> mbuf = __rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(vpool->pool);
>> if (likely(mbuf != NULL)) {
>> - if (likely(MBUF_EXT_MEM(mbuf)))
>> - pktmbuf_detach_zcp(mbuf);
>> + if (likely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(mbuf)))
>> + rte_pktmbuf_detach(mbuf);
>> rte_ring_sp_enqueue(vpool->ring, (void *)mbuf);
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -2149,7 +2121,7 @@ switch_worker_zcp(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
>> }
>> while (likely(rx_count)) {
>> rx_count--;
>> - pktmbuf_detach_zcp(
>> + rte_pktmbuf_detach(
>> pkts_burst[rx_count]);
>> rte_ring_sp_enqueue(
>> vpool_array[index].ring,
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 18:43 Zoltan Kiss
2015-03-26 1:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-26 3:32 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-03-26 16:46 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2015-03-26 17:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-26 18:01 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551437D6.80503@linaro.org \
--to=zoltan.kiss@linaro.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).