From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:57:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55197260.3050704@cloudius-systems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55196DBC.1000103@cloudius-systems.com>
On 03/30/15 18:37, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>
>
> On 03/30/15 17:18, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>> Hi Vlad,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:52 PM
>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support
>>>
>>> - Only x540 and 82599 devices support LRO.
>>> - Add the appropriate HW configuration.
>>> - Add RSC aware rx_pkt_burst() handlers:
>>> - Implemented bulk allocation and non-bulk allocation versions.
>>> - Add LRO-specific fields to rte_eth_rxmode, to
>>> rte_eth_dev_data
>>> and to ixgbe_rx_queue.
>>> - Use the appropriate handler when LRO is requested.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
>>> ---
>>> New in v8:
>>> - Took the RSC configuration code from ixgbe_dev_rx_init() into
>>> a separate
>>> function - ixgbe_set_rsc().
>>> - Added some missing macros for HW configuration.
>>> - Styling adjustments:
>>> - Functions names.
>>> - Functions descriptions.
>>> - Reworked the ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster() code to make it more
>>> readable.
>>> - Kill the HEADER_SPLIT flow in ixgbe_set_rsc() since it's not
>>> supported by
>>> ixgbe PMD.
>>>
>>> New in v7:
>>> - Free not-yet-completed RSC aggregations in rte_eth_dev_stop()
>>> flow.
>>> - Reset the sw_ring[].mbuf entry in a bulk allocation case.
>>> This is needed for ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs().
>>> - _recv_pkts_lro(): added the missing memory barrier before RDT
>>> update in a
>>> non-bulk allocation case.
>>> - Don't allow RSC when device is configured in an SR-IOV mode.
>>>
>>> New in v5:
>>> - Put the RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT definition at the beginning
>>> of rte_ethdev.h.
>>> - Removed the "TODO: Remove me" comment near
>>> RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT.
>>>
>>> New in v4:
>>> - Define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT in rte_ethdev.h instead of
>>> RTE_ETHDEV_LRO_SUPPORT defined in config/common_linuxapp.
>>>
>>> New in v2:
>>> - Removed rte_eth_dev_data.lro_bulk_alloc.
>>> - Fixed a few styling and spelling issues.
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 9 +-
>>> lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 3 +
>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 6 +
>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 11 +
>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 610
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 6 +
>>> 7 files changed, 642 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> index 21aa359..61dc49a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ extern "C" {
>>>
>>> #include <stdint.h>
>>>
>>> +/* Use this macro to check if LRO API is supported */
>>> +#define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT
>>> +
>>> #include <rte_log.h>
>>> #include <rte_interrupts.h>
>>> #include <rte_pci.h>
>>> @@ -320,14 +323,15 @@ struct rte_eth_rxmode {
>>> enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode mq_mode;
>>> uint32_t max_rx_pkt_len; /**< Only used if jumbo_frame
>>> enabled. */
>>> uint16_t split_hdr_size; /**< hdr buf size (header_split
>>> enabled).*/
>>> - uint8_t header_split : 1, /**< Header Split enable. */
>>> + uint16_t header_split : 1, /**< Header Split enable. */
>>> hw_ip_checksum : 1, /**< IP/UDP/TCP checksum offload
>>> enable. */
>>> hw_vlan_filter : 1, /**< VLAN filter enable. */
>>> hw_vlan_strip : 1, /**< VLAN strip enable. */
>>> hw_vlan_extend : 1, /**< Extended VLAN enable. */
>>> jumbo_frame : 1, /**< Jumbo Frame Receipt enable. */
>>> hw_strip_crc : 1, /**< Enable CRC stripping by
>>> hardware. */
>>> - enable_scatter : 1; /**< Enable scatter packets rx
>>> handler */
>>> + enable_scatter : 1, /**< Enable scatter packets rx
>>> handler */
>>> + enable_lro : 1; /**< Enable LRO */
>>> };
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -1515,6 +1519,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_data {
>>> uint8_t port_id; /**< Device [external] port
>>> identifier. */
>>> uint8_t promiscuous : 1, /**< RX promiscuous mode ON(1) /
>>> OFF(0). */
>>> scattered_rx : 1, /**< RX of scattered packets is ON(1) /
>>> OFF(0) */
>>> + lro : 1, /**< RX LRO is ON(1) / OFF(0) */
>>> all_multicast : 1, /**< RX all multicast mode ON(1) /
>>> OFF(0). */
>>> dev_started : 1; /**< Device state: STARTED(1) /
>>> STOPPED(0). */
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>> index 64935d9..74c9ced 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct ipv4_hdr {
>>> (((c) & 0xff) << 8) | \
>>> ((d) & 0xff))
>>>
>>> +/** Maximal IPv4 packet length (including a header) */
>>> +#define IPV4_MAX_PKT_LEN 65535
>>> +
>>> /** Internet header length mask for version_ihl field */
>>> #define IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK (0x0f)
>>> /**
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> index 9a66370..4998627 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> @@ -234,8 +234,14 @@ struct ixgbe_thermal_sensor_data {
>>> #define IXGBE_EITR(_i) (((_i) <= 23) ? (0x00820 + ((_i) *
>>> 4)) : \
>>> (0x012300 + (((_i) - 24) * 4)))
>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK 0x00000FF8
>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT 3
>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_LLI_MOD 0x00008000
>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_CNT_WDIS 0x80000000
>>> +/* EITR Inteval is in 2048ns uinits for 1G and 10G link */
>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_NS 2048
>> Why is that? Why not just 2us as 82599 spec says?
>> And then:
>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(us) (((us) /
>> IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_US << IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT) &
>> IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK)
>> ?
>
> Because spec doesn't say 2us but rather 2.048us - see 8.2.4.5.16
> chapter of x540 spec.
The most confusing part is that 82599 Rev. 3.0 spec does say so. The
x540 spec I have is dated by March 2014 and 82599 spec is dated by
November 2014 but according to changelog EITR description has never been
updated. Therefore I conclude that the more recent device spec (x540)
holds the most up to date content.
Pls., confirm.
thanks,
vlad
>
>>
>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(us) \
>>> + (((us) * 1000 / IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_NS <<
>>> IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT) & \
>>> + IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK)
>>
>> Unfortunately we are not supposed to change files under ixgbe
>> subfirectory (except ixgbe_osdep.*).
>> These files comes from ixgbe shared code and we treat them as read-only.
>> You need to move these new macros you added into ixgbe_ethedev.h.
>
> Aha... Ok. No problem.
>
>>
>> All other things look good to me.
>> Konstantin
>>
>>> #define IXGBE_IVAR(_i) (0x00900 + ((_i) * 4)) /* 24 at
>>> 0x900-0x960 */
>>> #define IXGBE_IVAR_MISC 0x00A00 /* misc MSI-X interrupt
>>> causes */
>>> #define IXGBE_EITRSEL 0x00894
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> index 92d75db..923692e 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>
>>> /* Clear stored conf */
>>> dev->data->scattered_rx = 0;
>>> + dev->data->lro = 0;
>>>
>>> /* Clear recorded link status */
>>> memset(&link, 0, sizeof(link));
>>> @@ -2013,6 +2014,16 @@ ixgbe_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a
>>> non-SR-IOV
>>> + * mode.
>>> + */
>>> + if ((hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82599EB ||
>>> + hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_X540) &&
>>> + !RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active)
>>> + dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO;
>>> +
>>> dev_info->tx_offload_capa =
>>> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
>>> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>> index ffe3471..7050340 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>> @@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct
>>> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>> uint16_t ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue,
>>> struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>
>>> +uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc(void *rx_queue,
>>> + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>> +uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc(void *rx_queue,
>>> + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>> +
>>> uint16_t ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>>> uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>> index a08ae6a..daa4c45 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
>>> #include <rte_sctp.h>
>>> #include <rte_string_fns.h>
>>> #include <rte_errno.h>
>>> +#include <rte_ip.h>
>>>
>>> #include "ixgbe_logs.h"
>>> #include "ixgbe/ixgbe_api.h"
>>> @@ -1422,6 +1423,295 @@ ixgbe_fill_cluster_head_buf(
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro - receive handler for and LRO case.
>>> + *
>>> + * @rx_queue Rx queue handle
>>> + * @rx_pkts table of received packets
>>> + * @nb_pkts size of rx_pkts table
>>> + * @bulk_alloc if TRUE bulk allocation is used for a HW ring refilling
>>> + *
>>> + * Handles the Rx HW ring completions when RSC feature is
>>> configured. Uses an
>>> + * additional ring of ixgbe_rsc_entry's that will hold the relevant
>>> RSC info.
>>> + *
>>> + * We use the same logic as in Lunux and in FreeBSD ixgbe drivers:
>>> + * 1) When non-EOP RSC completion arrives:
>>> + * a) Update the HEAD of the current RSC aggregation cluster
>>> with the new
>>> + * segment's data length.
>>> + * b) Set the "next" pointer of the current segment to point to
>>> the segment
>>> + * at the NEXTP index.
>>> + * c) Pass the HEAD of RSC aggregation cluster on to the next
>>> NEXTP entry
>>> + * in the sw_rsc_ring.
>>> + * 2) When EOP arrives we just update the cluster's total length
>>> and offload
>>> + * flags and deliver the cluster up to the upper layers. In our
>>> case - put it
>>> + * in the rx_pkts table.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns the number of received packets/clusters (according to
>>> the "bulk
>>> + * receive" interface).
>>> + */
>>> +static inline uint16_t
>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>> uint16_t nb_pkts,
>>> + bool bulk_alloc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
>>> + volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_ring = rxq->rx_ring;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring = rxq->sw_ring;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *sw_rsc_ring = rxq->sw_rsc_ring;
>>> + uint16_t rx_id = rxq->rx_tail;
>>> + uint16_t nb_rx = 0;
>>> + uint16_t nb_hold = rxq->nb_rx_hold;
>>> + uint16_t prev_id = rxq->rx_tail;
>>> +
>>> + while (nb_rx < nb_pkts) {
>>> + bool eop;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *rxe;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *rsc_entry;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *next_rsc_entry;
>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe;
>>> + struct rte_mbuf *first_seg;
>>> + struct rte_mbuf *rxm;
>>> + struct rte_mbuf *nmb;
>>> + union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc rxd;
>>> + uint16_t data_len;
>>> + uint16_t next_id;
>>> + volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rxdp;
>>> + uint32_t staterr;
>>> +
>>> +next_desc:
>>> + /*
>>> + * The code in this whole file uses the volatile pointer to
>>> + * ensure the read ordering of the status and the rest of the
>>> + * descriptor fields (on the compiler level only!!!). This
>>> is so
>>> + * UGLY - why not to just use the compiler barrier instead?
>>> DPDK
>>> + * even has the rte_compiler_barrier() for that.
>>> + *
>>> + * But most importantly this is just wrong because this
>>> doesn't
>>> + * ensure memory ordering in a general case at all. For
>>> + * instance, DPDK is supposed to work on Power CPUs where
>>> + * compiler barrier may just not be enough!
>>> + *
>>> + * I tried to write only this function properly to have a
>>> + * starting point (as a part of an LRO/RSC series) but the
>>> + * compiler cursed at me when I tried to cast away the
>>> + * "volatile" from rx_ring (yes, it's volatile too!!!). So,
>>> I'm
>>> + * keeping it the way it is for now.
>>> + *
>>> + * The code in this file is broken in so many other places and
>>> + * will just not work on a big endian CPU anyway therefore the
>>> + * lines below will have to be revisited together with the
>>> rest
>>> + * of the ixgbe PMD.
>>> + *
>>> + * TODO:
>>> + * - Get rid of "volatile" crap and let the compiler do its
>>> + * job.
>>> + * - Use the proper memory barrier (rte_rmb()) to ensure
>>> the
>>> + * memory ordering below.
>>> + */
>>> + rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id];
>>> + staterr = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error);
>>> +
>>> + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + rxd = *rxdp;
>>> +
>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u rx_id=%u "
>>> + "staterr=0x%x data_len=%u",
>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id, rx_id, staterr,
>>> + rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length));
>>> +
>>> + if (!bulk_alloc) {
>>> + nmb = rte_rxmbuf_alloc(rxq->mb_pool);
>>> + if (nmb == NULL) {
>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "RX mbuf alloc failed "
>>> + "port_id=%u queue_id=%u",
>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id);
>>> +
>>> + rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->
>>> + rx_mbuf_alloc_failed++;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (nb_hold > rxq->rx_free_thresh) {
>>> + uint16_t next_rdt = rxq->rx_free_trigger;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(rxq, false)) {
>>> + rte_wmb();
>>> + IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->rdt_reg_addr,
>>> + next_rdt);
>>> + nb_hold -= rxq->rx_free_thresh;
>>> + } else {
>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "RX bulk alloc failed "
>>> + "port_id=%u queue_id=%u",
>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id);
>>> +
>>> + rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->
>>> + rx_mbuf_alloc_failed++;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + nb_hold++;
>>> + rxe = &sw_ring[rx_id];
>>> + eop = staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_EOP;
>>> +
>>> + next_id = rx_id + 1;
>>> + if (next_id == rxq->nb_rx_desc)
>>> + next_id = 0;
>>> +
>>> + /* Prefetch next mbuf while processing current one. */
>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(sw_ring[next_id].mbuf);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * When next RX descriptor is on a cache-line boundary,
>>> + * prefetch the next 4 RX descriptors and the next 4 pointers
>>> + * to mbufs.
>>> + */
>>> + if ((next_id & 0x3) == 0) {
>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(&rx_ring[next_id]);
>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(&sw_ring[next_id]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rxm = rxe->mbuf;
>>> +
>>> + if (!bulk_alloc) {
>>> + __le64 dma =
>>> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(nmb));
>>> + /*
>>> + * Update RX descriptor with the physical address of the
>>> + * new data buffer of the new allocated mbuf.
>>> + */
>>> + rxe->mbuf = nmb;
>>> +
>>> + rxm->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
>>> + rxdp->read.hdr_addr = dma;
>>> + rxdp->read.pkt_addr = dma;
>>> + } else
>>> + rxe->mbuf = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Set data length & data buffer address of mbuf.
>>> + */
>>> + data_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length);
>>> + rxm->data_len = data_len;
>>> +
>>> + if (!eop) {
>>> + uint16_t nextp_id;
>>> + /*
>>> + * Get next descriptor index:
>>> + * - For RSC it's in the NEXTP field.
>>> + * - For a scattered packet - it's just a following
>>> + * descriptor.
>>> + */
>>> + if (ixgbe_rsc_count(&rxd))
>>> + nextp_id =
>>> + (staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_NEXTP_MASK) >>
>>> + IXGBE_RXDADV_NEXTP_SHIFT;
>>> + else
>>> + nextp_id = next_id;
>>> +
>>> + next_rsc_entry = &sw_rsc_ring[nextp_id];
>>> + next_rxe = &sw_ring[nextp_id];
>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(next_rxe);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rsc_entry = &sw_rsc_ring[rx_id];
>>> + first_seg = rsc_entry->fbuf;
>>> + rsc_entry->fbuf = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If this is the first buffer of the received packet,
>>> + * set the pointer to the first mbuf of the packet and
>>> + * initialize its context.
>>> + * Otherwise, update the total length and the number of
>>> segments
>>> + * of the current scattered packet, and update the pointer to
>>> + * the last mbuf of the current packet.
>>> + */
>>> + if (first_seg == NULL) {
>>> + first_seg = rxm;
>>> + first_seg->pkt_len = data_len;
>>> + first_seg->nb_segs = 1;
>>> + } else {
>>> + first_seg->pkt_len += data_len;
>>> + first_seg->nb_segs++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + prev_id = rx_id;
>>> + rx_id = next_id;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If this is not the last buffer of the received packet,
>>> update
>>> + * the pointer to the first mbuf at the NEXTP entry in the
>>> + * sw_rsc_ring and continue to parse the RX ring.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!eop) {
>>> + rxm->next = next_rxe->mbuf;
>>> + next_rsc_entry->fbuf = first_seg;
>>> + goto next_desc;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * This is the last buffer of the received packet - return
>>> + * the current cluster to the user.
>>> + */
>>> + rxm->next = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /* Initialize the first mbuf of the returned packet */
>>> + ixgbe_fill_cluster_head_buf(first_seg, &rxd, rxq->port_id,
>>> + staterr);
>>> +
>>> + /* Prefetch data of first segment, if configured to do so. */
>>> + rte_packet_prefetch((char *)first_seg->buf_addr +
>>> + first_seg->data_off);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Store the mbuf address into the next entry of the array
>>> + * of returned packets.
>>> + */
>>> + rx_pkts[nb_rx++] = first_seg;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Record index of the next RX descriptor to probe.
>>> + */
>>> + rxq->rx_tail = rx_id;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If the number of free RX descriptors is greater than the RX
>>> free
>>> + * threshold of the queue, advance the Receive Descriptor Tail
>>> (RDT)
>>> + * register.
>>> + * Update the RDT with the value of the last processed RX
>>> descriptor
>>> + * minus 1, to guarantee that the RDT register is never equal
>>> to the
>>> + * RDH register, which creates a "full" ring situtation from the
>>> + * hardware point of view...
>>> + */
>>> + if (!bulk_alloc && nb_hold > rxq->rx_free_thresh) {
>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u rx_tail=%u "
>>> + "nb_hold=%u nb_rx=%u",
>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id, rx_id, nb_hold, nb_rx);
>>> +
>>> + rte_wmb();
>>> + IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->rdt_reg_addr, prev_id);
>>> + nb_hold = 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rxq->nb_rx_hold = nb_hold;
>>> + return nb_rx;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +uint16_t
>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
>>> **rx_pkts,
>>> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>> +{
>>> + return ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, false);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +uint16_t
>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
>>> **rx_pkts,
>>> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>> +{
>>> + return ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, true);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> uint16_t
>>> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>> uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>> @@ -2005,6 +2295,31 @@ ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *dev,
>>> return (0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster - free the not-yet-completed RSC cluster
>>> + *
>>> + * The "next" pointer of the last segment of (not-yet-completed)
>>> RSC clusters
>>> + * in the sw_rsc_ring is not set to NULL but rather points to the next
>>> + * mbuf of this RSC aggregation (that has not been completed yet
>>> and still
>>> + * resides on the HW ring). So, instead of calling for
>>> rte_pktmbuf_free() we
>>> + * will just free first "nb_segs" segments of the cluster
>>> explicitly by calling
>>> + * an rte_pktmbuf_free_seg().
>>> + *
>>> + * @m RSC cluster head
>>> + */
>>> +static void
>>> +ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>>> +{
>>> + uint8_t i, nb_segs = m->nb_segs;
>>> + struct rte_mbuf *next_seg;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < nb_segs; i++) {
>>> + next_seg = m->next;
>>> + rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(m);
>>> + m = next_seg;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void
>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2028,6 +2343,13 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
>>> ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + if (rxq->sw_rsc_ring)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < rxq->nb_rx_desc; i++)
>>> + if (rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf) {
>>> + ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster(rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf);
>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>>> @@ -2036,6 +2358,7 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release(struct ixgbe_rx_queue
>>> *rxq)
>>> if (rxq != NULL) {
>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
>>> rte_free(rxq->sw_ring);
>>> + rte_free(rxq->sw_rsc_ring);
>>> rte_free(rxq);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> @@ -2158,6 +2481,7 @@ ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>> struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>> rxq->nb_rx_hold = 0;
>>> rxq->pkt_first_seg = NULL;
>>> rxq->pkt_last_seg = NULL;
>>> + rxq->rsc_en = 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int
>>> @@ -2172,6 +2496,14 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *dev,
>>> struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq;
>>> struct ixgbe_hw *hw;
>>> uint16_t len;
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = { 0 };
>>> + struct rte_eth_rxmode *dev_rx_mode = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>> + bool rsc_requested = false;
>>> +
>>> + dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get(dev, &dev_info);
>>> + if ((dev_info.rx_offload_capa & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO) &&
>>> + dev_rx_mode->enable_lro)
>>> + rsc_requested = true;
>>>
>>> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>> hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>> @@ -2277,12 +2609,27 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *dev,
>>> rxq->sw_ring = rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_ring",
>>> sizeof(struct ixgbe_rx_entry) * len,
>>> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
>>> - if (rxq->sw_ring == NULL) {
>>> + if (!rxq->sw_ring) {
>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release(rxq);
>>> return (-ENOMEM);
>>> }
>>> - PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "sw_ring=%p hw_ring=%p dma_addr=0x%"PRIx64,
>>> - rxq->sw_ring, rxq->rx_ring, rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr);
>>> +
>>> + if (rsc_requested) {
>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring =
>>> + rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_rsc_ring",
>>> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_rsc_entry) * len,
>>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
>>> + if (!rxq->sw_rsc_ring) {
>>> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release(rxq);
>>> + return (-ENOMEM);
>>> + }
>>> + } else
>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "sw_ring=%p sw_rsc_ring=%p hw_ring=%p "
>>> + "dma_addr=0x%"PRIx64,
>>> + rxq->sw_ring, rxq->sw_rsc_ring, rxq->rx_ring,
>>> + rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr);
>>>
>>> if (!rte_is_power_of_2(nb_desc)) {
>>> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "queue[%d] doesn't meet Vector Rx "
>>> @@ -3527,6 +3874,91 @@ ixgbe_dev_mq_tx_configure(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *dev)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc - Calculate the RSCCTL[n].MAXDESC for PF
>>> + *
>>> + * Return the RSCCTL[n].MAXDESC for 82599 and x540 PF devices
>>> according to the
>>> + * spec rev. 3.0 chapter 8.2.3.8.13.
>>> + *
>>> + * @pool Memory pool of the Rx queue
>>> + */
>>> +static inline uint32_t
>>> +ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc(struct rte_mempool *pool)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private *mp_priv =
>>> rte_mempool_get_priv(pool);
>>> +
>>> + /* MAXDESC * SRRCTL.BSIZEPKT must not exceed 64 KB minus one */
>>> + uint16_t maxdesc =
>>> + IPV4_MAX_PKT_LEN /
>>> + (mp_priv->mbuf_data_room_size - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
>>> +
>>> + if (maxdesc >= 16)
>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_16;
>>> + else if (maxdesc >= 8)
>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_8;
>>> + else if (maxdesc >= 4)
>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_4;
>>> + else
>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * ixgbe_set_ivar - Setup the correct IVAR register for a
>>> particular MSIX
>>> + * interrupt
>>> + *
>>> + * (Taken from FreeBSD tree)
>>> + * (yes this is all very magic and confusing :)
>>> + *
>>> + * @dev port handle
>>> + * @entry the register array entry
>>> + * @vector the MSIX vector for this queue
>>> + * @type RX/TX/MISC
>>> + */
>>> +static void
>>> +ixgbe_set_ivar(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, u8 entry, u8 vector, s8 type)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>> + u32 ivar, index;
>>> +
>>> + vector |= IXGBE_IVAR_ALLOC_VAL;
>>> +
>>> + switch (hw->mac.type) {
>>> +
>>> + case ixgbe_mac_82598EB:
>>> + if (type == -1)
>>> + entry = IXGBE_IVAR_OTHER_CAUSES_INDEX;
>>> + else
>>> + entry += (type * 64);
>>> + index = (entry >> 2) & 0x1F;
>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(index));
>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << (8 * (entry & 0x3)));
>>> + ivar |= (vector << (8 * (entry & 0x3)));
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(index), ivar);
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + case ixgbe_mac_82599EB:
>>> + case ixgbe_mac_X540:
>>> + if (type == -1) { /* MISC IVAR */
>>> + index = (entry & 1) * 8;
>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR_MISC);
>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << index);
>>> + ivar |= (vector << index);
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR_MISC, ivar);
>>> + } else { /* RX/TX IVARS */
>>> + index = (16 * (entry & 1)) + (8 * type);
>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(entry >> 1));
>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << index);
>>> + ivar |= (vector << index);
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(entry >> 1), ivar);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>> @@ -3545,7 +3977,24 @@ void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *dev)
>>> hw->rx_vec_allowed = false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Initialize the appropriate LRO callback.
>>> + *
>>> + * If all queues satisfy the bulk allocation preconditions
>>> + * (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed is TRUE) then we may use bulk
>>> allocation.
>>> + * Otherwise use a single allocation version.
>>> + */
>>> + if (dev->data->lro) {
>>> + if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "LRO is requested. Using a bulk "
>>> + "allocation version");
>>> + dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc;
>>> + } else {
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "LRO is requested. Using a single "
>>> + "allocation version");
>>> + dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc;
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
>>> /*
>>> * Set the non-LRO scattered callback: there are Vector and
>>> * single allocation versions.
>>> @@ -3595,6 +4044,149 @@ void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct
>>> rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ixgbe_set_rsc - configure RSC related port HW registers
>>> + *
>>> + * Configures the port's RSC related registers according to the
>>> 4.6.7.2 chapter
>>> + * of 82599 Spec (x540 configuration is virtually the same).
>>> + *
>>> + * @dev port handle
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns 0 in case of success or a non-zero error code
>>> + */
>>> +static int
>>> +ixgbe_set_rsc(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_eth_rxmode *rx_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = { 0 };
>>> + bool rsc_capable = false;
>>> + uint16_t i;
>>> + uint32_t rdrxctl;
>>> +
>>> + /* Sanity check */
>>> + dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get(dev, &dev_info);
>>> + if (dev_info.rx_offload_capa & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO)
>>> + rsc_capable = true;
>>> +
>>> + if (!rsc_capable && rx_conf->enable_lro) {
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(CRIT, "LRO is requested on HW that doesn't "
>>> + "support it");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* RSC global configuration (chapter 4.6.7.2.1 of 82599 Spec) */
>>> +
>>> + if (!rx_conf->hw_strip_crc && rx_conf->enable_lro) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * According to chapter of 4.6.7.2.1 of the Spec Rev.
>>> + * 3.0 RSC configuration requires HW CRC stripping being
>>> + * enabled. If user requested both HW CRC stripping off
>>> + * and RSC on - return an error.
>>> + */
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(CRIT, "LRO can't be enabled when HW CRC "
>>> + "is disabled");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* RFCTL configuration */
>>> + if (rsc_capable) {
>>> + uint32_t rfctl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RFCTL);
>>> + if (rx_conf->enable_lro)
>>> + /*
>>> + * Since NFS packets coalescing is not supported - clear
>>> + * RFCTL.NFSW_DIS and RFCTL.NFSR_DIS when RSC is
>>> + * enabled.
>>> + */
>>> + rfctl &= ~(IXGBE_RFCTL_RSC_DIS | IXGBE_RFCTL_NFSW_DIS |
>>> + IXGBE_RFCTL_NFSR_DIS);
>>> + else
>>> + rfctl |= IXGBE_RFCTL_RSC_DIS;
>>> +
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RFCTL, rfctl);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* If LRO hasn't been requested - we are done here. */
>>> + if (!rx_conf->enable_lro)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + /* Set RDRXCTL.RSCACKC bit */
>>> + rdrxctl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL);
>>> + rdrxctl |= IXGBE_RDRXCTL_RSCACKC;
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL, rdrxctl);
>>> +
>>> + /* Per-queue RSC configuration (chapter 4.6.7.2.2 of 82599
>>> Spec) */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
>>> + uint32_t srrctl =
>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx));
>>> + uint32_t rscctl =
>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RSCCTL(rxq->reg_idx));
>>> + uint32_t psrtype =
>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_PSRTYPE(rxq->reg_idx));
>>> + uint32_t eitr =
>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_EITR(rxq->reg_idx));
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * ixgbe PMD doesn't support header-split at the moment.
>>> + *
>>> + * Following the 4.6.7.2.1 chapter of the 82599/x540
>>> + * Spec if RSC is enabled the SRRCTL[n].BSIZEHEADER
>>> + * should be configured even if header split is not
>>> + * enabled. We will configure it 128 bytes following the
>>> + * recommendation in the spec.
>>> + */
>>> + srrctl &= ~IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDR_MASK;
>>> + srrctl |= (128 << IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDRSIZE_SHIFT) &
>>> + IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDR_MASK;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * TODO: Consider setting the Receive Descriptor Minimum
>>> + * Threshold Size for an RSC case. This is not an obviously
>>> + * beneficiary option but the one worth considering...
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + rscctl |= IXGBE_RSCCTL_RSCEN;
>>> + rscctl |= ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc(rxq->mb_pool);
>>> + psrtype |= IXGBE_PSRTYPE_TCPHDR;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * RSC: Set ITR interval corresponding to 2K ints/s.
>>> + *
>>> + * Full-sized RSC aggregations for a 10Gb/s link will
>>> + * arrive at about 20K aggregation/s rate.
>>> + *
>>> + * 2K inst/s rate will make only 10% of the
>>> + * aggregations to be closed due to the interrupt timer
>>> + * expiration for a streaming at wire-speed case.
>>> + *
>>> + * For a sparse streaming case this setting will yield
>>> + * at most 500us latency for a single RSC aggregation.
>>> + */
>>> + eitr &= ~IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK;
>>> + eitr |= IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(500) | IXGBE_EITR_CNT_WDIS;
>>> +
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx), srrctl);
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RSCCTL(rxq->reg_idx), rscctl);
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_PSRTYPE(rxq->reg_idx), psrtype);
>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_EITR(rxq->reg_idx), eitr);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * RSC requires the mapping of the queue to the
>>> + * interrupt vector.
>>> + */
>>> + ixgbe_set_ivar(dev, rxq->reg_idx, i, 0);
>>> +
>>> + rxq->rsc_en = 1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + dev->data->lro = 1;
>>> +
>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "enabling LRO mode");
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Initializes Receive Unit.
>>> */
>>> @@ -3615,6 +4207,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> uint16_t buf_size;
>>> uint16_t i;
>>> struct rte_eth_rxmode *rx_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>> + int rc;
>>>
>>> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>> hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>> @@ -3724,6 +4317,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
>>> srrctl |= ((buf_size >> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT) &
>>> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_MASK);
>>> +
>>> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx), srrctl);
>>>
>>> buf_size = (uint16_t) ((srrctl &
>>> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_MASK) <<
>>> @@ -3738,8 +4332,6 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> if (rx_conf->enable_scatter)
>>> dev->data->scattered_rx = 1;
>>>
>>> - ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * Device configured with multiple RX queues.
>>> */
>>> @@ -3770,6 +4362,12 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL, rdrxctl);
>>> }
>>>
>>> + rc = ixgbe_set_rsc(dev);
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + return rc;
>>> +
>>> + ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>> index 3937cf6..120bbbd 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>> @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_entry {
>>> struct rte_mbuf *mbuf; /**< mbuf associated with RX
>>> descriptor. */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct ixgbe_rsc_entry {
>>> + struct rte_mbuf *fbuf; /**< First segment of the fragmented
>>> packet. */
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * Structure associated with each descriptor of the TX ring of a
>>> TX queue.
>>> */
>>> @@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_queue {
>>> volatile uint32_t *rdt_reg_addr; /**< RDT register address. */
>>> volatile uint32_t *rdh_reg_addr; /**< RDH register address. */
>>> struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring; /**< address of RX software
>>> ring. */
>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *sw_rsc_ring; /**< address of RSC
>>> software ring. */
>>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt_first_seg; /**< First segment of current
>>> packet. */
>>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt_last_seg; /**< Last segment of current
>>> packet. */
>>> uint64_t mbuf_initializer; /**< value to init mbufs */
>>> @@ -126,6 +131,7 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_queue {
>>> uint8_t port_id; /**< Device port identifier. */
>>> uint8_t crc_len; /**< 0 if CRC stripped, 4
>>> otherwise. */
>>> uint8_t drop_en; /**< If not 0, set
>>> SRRCTL.Drop_En. */
>>> + uint8_t rsc_en; /**< If not 0, RSC is enabled. */
>>> uint8_t rx_deferred_start; /**< not in global dev
>>> start. */
>>> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
>>> /** need to alloc dummy mbuf, for wraparound when scanning hw
>>> ring */
>>> --
>>> 2.1.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 17:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] ixgbe: Cleanups Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ixgbe: Code refactoring Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 14:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-30 15:37 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 15:57 ` Vlad Zolotarov [this message]
2015-03-29 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-22 1:23 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22 1:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22 2:01 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22 2:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22 2:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-22 4:58 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-22 5:28 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-22 9:19 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-23 0:28 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-23 9:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-04-23 11:01 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772582142100A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-04-23 11:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-31 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-31 11:40 ` Vlad Zolotarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55197260.3050704@cloudius-systems.com \
--to=vladz@cloudius-systems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).