From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:40:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551A87AF.4040805@cloudius-systems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821413084@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 03/31/15 13:25, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:57 PM
>> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/30/15 18:37, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/30/15 17:18, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>>> Hi Vlad,
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:52 PM
>>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support
>>>>>
>>>>> - Only x540 and 82599 devices support LRO.
>>>>> - Add the appropriate HW configuration.
>>>>> - Add RSC aware rx_pkt_burst() handlers:
>>>>> - Implemented bulk allocation and non-bulk allocation versions.
>>>>> - Add LRO-specific fields to rte_eth_rxmode, to
>>>>> rte_eth_dev_data
>>>>> and to ixgbe_rx_queue.
>>>>> - Use the appropriate handler when LRO is requested.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> New in v8:
>>>>> - Took the RSC configuration code from ixgbe_dev_rx_init() into
>>>>> a separate
>>>>> function - ixgbe_set_rsc().
>>>>> - Added some missing macros for HW configuration.
>>>>> - Styling adjustments:
>>>>> - Functions names.
>>>>> - Functions descriptions.
>>>>> - Reworked the ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster() code to make it more
>>>>> readable.
>>>>> - Kill the HEADER_SPLIT flow in ixgbe_set_rsc() since it's not
>>>>> supported by
>>>>> ixgbe PMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> New in v7:
>>>>> - Free not-yet-completed RSC aggregations in rte_eth_dev_stop()
>>>>> flow.
>>>>> - Reset the sw_ring[].mbuf entry in a bulk allocation case.
>>>>> This is needed for ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs().
>>>>> - _recv_pkts_lro(): added the missing memory barrier before RDT
>>>>> update in a
>>>>> non-bulk allocation case.
>>>>> - Don't allow RSC when device is configured in an SR-IOV mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> New in v5:
>>>>> - Put the RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT definition at the beginning
>>>>> of rte_ethdev.h.
>>>>> - Removed the "TODO: Remove me" comment near
>>>>> RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT.
>>>>>
>>>>> New in v4:
>>>>> - Define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT in rte_ethdev.h instead of
>>>>> RTE_ETHDEV_LRO_SUPPORT defined in config/common_linuxapp.
>>>>>
>>>>> New in v2:
>>>>> - Removed rte_eth_dev_data.lro_bulk_alloc.
>>>>> - Fixed a few styling and spelling issues.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 9 +-
>>>>> lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 3 +
>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 6 +
>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 11 +
>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 610
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 6 +
>>>>> 7 files changed, 642 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> index 21aa359..61dc49a 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ extern "C" {
>>>>>
>>>>> #include <stdint.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Use this macro to check if LRO API is supported */
>>>>> +#define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT
>>>>> +
>>>>> #include <rte_log.h>
>>>>> #include <rte_interrupts.h>
>>>>> #include <rte_pci.h>
>>>>> @@ -320,14 +323,15 @@ struct rte_eth_rxmode {
>>>>> enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode mq_mode;
>>>>> uint32_t max_rx_pkt_len; /**< Only used if jumbo_frame
>>>>> enabled. */
>>>>> uint16_t split_hdr_size; /**< hdr buf size (header_split
>>>>> enabled).*/
>>>>> - uint8_t header_split : 1, /**< Header Split enable. */
>>>>> + uint16_t header_split : 1, /**< Header Split enable. */
>>>>> hw_ip_checksum : 1, /**< IP/UDP/TCP checksum offload
>>>>> enable. */
>>>>> hw_vlan_filter : 1, /**< VLAN filter enable. */
>>>>> hw_vlan_strip : 1, /**< VLAN strip enable. */
>>>>> hw_vlan_extend : 1, /**< Extended VLAN enable. */
>>>>> jumbo_frame : 1, /**< Jumbo Frame Receipt enable. */
>>>>> hw_strip_crc : 1, /**< Enable CRC stripping by
>>>>> hardware. */
>>>>> - enable_scatter : 1; /**< Enable scatter packets rx
>>>>> handler */
>>>>> + enable_scatter : 1, /**< Enable scatter packets rx
>>>>> handler */
>>>>> + enable_lro : 1; /**< Enable LRO */
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> @@ -1515,6 +1519,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_data {
>>>>> uint8_t port_id; /**< Device [external] port
>>>>> identifier. */
>>>>> uint8_t promiscuous : 1, /**< RX promiscuous mode ON(1) /
>>>>> OFF(0). */
>>>>> scattered_rx : 1, /**< RX of scattered packets is ON(1) /
>>>>> OFF(0) */
>>>>> + lro : 1, /**< RX LRO is ON(1) / OFF(0) */
>>>>> all_multicast : 1, /**< RX all multicast mode ON(1) /
>>>>> OFF(0). */
>>>>> dev_started : 1; /**< Device state: STARTED(1) /
>>>>> STOPPED(0). */
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>>>> index 64935d9..74c9ced 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
>>>>> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct ipv4_hdr {
>>>>> (((c) & 0xff) << 8) | \
>>>>> ((d) & 0xff))
>>>>>
>>>>> +/** Maximal IPv4 packet length (including a header) */
>>>>> +#define IPV4_MAX_PKT_LEN 65535
>>>>> +
>>>>> /** Internet header length mask for version_ihl field */
>>>>> #define IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK (0x0f)
>>>>> /**
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>>>> index 9a66370..4998627 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>>>> @@ -234,8 +234,14 @@ struct ixgbe_thermal_sensor_data {
>>>>> #define IXGBE_EITR(_i) (((_i) <= 23) ? (0x00820 + ((_i) *
>>>>> 4)) : \
>>>>> (0x012300 + (((_i) - 24) * 4)))
>>>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK 0x00000FF8
>>>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT 3
>>>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_LLI_MOD 0x00008000
>>>>> #define IXGBE_EITR_CNT_WDIS 0x80000000
>>>>> +/* EITR Inteval is in 2048ns uinits for 1G and 10G link */
>>>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_NS 2048
>>>> Why is that? Why not just 2us as 82599 spec says?
>>>> And then:
>>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(us) (((us) /
>>>> IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_US << IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT) &
>>>> IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK)
>>>> ?
>>> Because spec doesn't say 2us but rather 2.048us - see 8.2.4.5.16
>>> chapter of x540 spec.
>> The most confusing part is that 82599 Rev. 3.0 spec does say so.
> I see what you mean now.
> Indeed that's a bit strange that in 82599 and X540 spec ITR_Interval units are different.
> We sent a question about this to HW guys, but don't know when there will be an answer.
> I suppose we can stick with 2.048 us case for now.
> From my understanding, even if 82599 uses 2us the difference in max timeout would be pretty small: 500 us vs 488 us
> and shouldn't cause any performance drop.
> I wonder did try your LRO latest changes on 82599?
> If yes, did you see any difference in performance vs previous version, when hardcoded value for 2us was used?
U are right about the negligible difference even if it exists (if it's
this is not a small mistake in a 82599 spec).
Unfortunately all 10G Intel NICs we have in our lab are x540 NICs.
However I doubt that I could have noticed the difference even if I had
82599 NICs. This is because I don't have a too sophisticated LRO test
suite here and I only checked LRO's basic functionality with a
multi-socket TCP streaming test. With this scenario the timer above is
going to influence only about 10% of the aggregations (like I explained
in the code) and if the latency drops to 488us it's going to be 10.25%
of the aggregations. So, I doubt that influence of this difference on
the performance is going to be easily separated from the statistics
noise... ;)
> Konstantin
>
>> The x540 spec I have is dated by March 2014 and 82599 spec is dated by
>> November 2014 but according to changelog EITR description has never been
>> updated. Therefore I conclude that the more recent device spec (x540)
>> holds the most up to date content.
>>
>> Pls., confirm.
>>
>> thanks,
>> vlad
>>
>>>>> +#define IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(us) \
>>>>> + (((us) * 1000 / IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_UNIT_NS <<
>>>>> IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_SHIFT) & \
>>>>> + IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK)
>>>> Unfortunately we are not supposed to change files under ixgbe
>>>> subfirectory (except ixgbe_osdep.*).
>>>> These files comes from ixgbe shared code and we treat them as read-only.
>>>> You need to move these new macros you added into ixgbe_ethedev.h.
>>> Aha... Ok. No problem.
>>>
>>>> All other things look good to me.
>>>> Konstantin
>>>>
>>>>> #define IXGBE_IVAR(_i) (0x00900 + ((_i) * 4)) /* 24 at
>>>>> 0x900-0x960 */
>>>>> #define IXGBE_IVAR_MISC 0x00A00 /* misc MSI-X interrupt
>>>>> causes */
>>>>> #define IXGBE_EITRSEL 0x00894
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>>>> index 92d75db..923692e 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>>>> @@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Clear stored conf */
>>>>> dev->data->scattered_rx = 0;
>>>>> + dev->data->lro = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Clear recorded link status */
>>>>> memset(&link, 0, sizeof(link));
>>>>> @@ -2013,6 +2014,16 @@ ixgbe_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>>> struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>>>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>>>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
>>>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a
>>>>> non-SR-IOV
>>>>> + * mode.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if ((hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82599EB ||
>>>>> + hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_X540) &&
>>>>> + !RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active)
>>>>> + dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO;
>>>>> +
>>>>> dev_info->tx_offload_capa =
>>>>> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
>>>>> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>>>> index ffe3471..7050340 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h
>>>>> @@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct
>>>>> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>>>> uint16_t ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue,
>>>>> struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>>>
>>>>> +uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc(void *rx_queue,
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>>> +uint16_t ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc(void *rx_queue,
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>>> +
>>>>> uint16_t ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>>>>> uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>>>> index a08ae6a..daa4c45 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>>>>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
>>>>> #include <rte_sctp.h>
>>>>> #include <rte_string_fns.h>
>>>>> #include <rte_errno.h>
>>>>> +#include <rte_ip.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> #include "ixgbe_logs.h"
>>>>> #include "ixgbe/ixgbe_api.h"
>>>>> @@ -1422,6 +1423,295 @@ ixgbe_fill_cluster_head_buf(
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro - receive handler for and LRO case.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @rx_queue Rx queue handle
>>>>> + * @rx_pkts table of received packets
>>>>> + * @nb_pkts size of rx_pkts table
>>>>> + * @bulk_alloc if TRUE bulk allocation is used for a HW ring refilling
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Handles the Rx HW ring completions when RSC feature is
>>>>> configured. Uses an
>>>>> + * additional ring of ixgbe_rsc_entry's that will hold the relevant
>>>>> RSC info.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * We use the same logic as in Lunux and in FreeBSD ixgbe drivers:
>>>>> + * 1) When non-EOP RSC completion arrives:
>>>>> + * a) Update the HEAD of the current RSC aggregation cluster
>>>>> with the new
>>>>> + * segment's data length.
>>>>> + * b) Set the "next" pointer of the current segment to point to
>>>>> the segment
>>>>> + * at the NEXTP index.
>>>>> + * c) Pass the HEAD of RSC aggregation cluster on to the next
>>>>> NEXTP entry
>>>>> + * in the sw_rsc_ring.
>>>>> + * 2) When EOP arrives we just update the cluster's total length
>>>>> and offload
>>>>> + * flags and deliver the cluster up to the upper layers. In our
>>>>> case - put it
>>>>> + * in the rx_pkts table.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Returns the number of received packets/clusters (according to
>>>>> the "bulk
>>>>> + * receive" interface).
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static inline uint16_t
>>>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>>>> uint16_t nb_pkts,
>>>>> + bool bulk_alloc)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
>>>>> + volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_ring = rxq->rx_ring;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring = rxq->sw_ring;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *sw_rsc_ring = rxq->sw_rsc_ring;
>>>>> + uint16_t rx_id = rxq->rx_tail;
>>>>> + uint16_t nb_rx = 0;
>>>>> + uint16_t nb_hold = rxq->nb_rx_hold;
>>>>> + uint16_t prev_id = rxq->rx_tail;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + while (nb_rx < nb_pkts) {
>>>>> + bool eop;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *rxe;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *rsc_entry;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *next_rsc_entry;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe;
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf *first_seg;
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf *rxm;
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf *nmb;
>>>>> + union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc rxd;
>>>>> + uint16_t data_len;
>>>>> + uint16_t next_id;
>>>>> + volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rxdp;
>>>>> + uint32_t staterr;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +next_desc:
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * The code in this whole file uses the volatile pointer to
>>>>> + * ensure the read ordering of the status and the rest of the
>>>>> + * descriptor fields (on the compiler level only!!!). This
>>>>> is so
>>>>> + * UGLY - why not to just use the compiler barrier instead?
>>>>> DPDK
>>>>> + * even has the rte_compiler_barrier() for that.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * But most importantly this is just wrong because this
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> + * ensure memory ordering in a general case at all. For
>>>>> + * instance, DPDK is supposed to work on Power CPUs where
>>>>> + * compiler barrier may just not be enough!
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * I tried to write only this function properly to have a
>>>>> + * starting point (as a part of an LRO/RSC series) but the
>>>>> + * compiler cursed at me when I tried to cast away the
>>>>> + * "volatile" from rx_ring (yes, it's volatile too!!!). So,
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> + * keeping it the way it is for now.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * The code in this file is broken in so many other places and
>>>>> + * will just not work on a big endian CPU anyway therefore the
>>>>> + * lines below will have to be revisited together with the
>>>>> rest
>>>>> + * of the ixgbe PMD.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * TODO:
>>>>> + * - Get rid of "volatile" crap and let the compiler do its
>>>>> + * job.
>>>>> + * - Use the proper memory barrier (rte_rmb()) to ensure
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * memory ordering below.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id];
>>>>> + staterr = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rxd = *rxdp;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u rx_id=%u "
>>>>> + "staterr=0x%x data_len=%u",
>>>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id, rx_id, staterr,
>>>>> + rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!bulk_alloc) {
>>>>> + nmb = rte_rxmbuf_alloc(rxq->mb_pool);
>>>>> + if (nmb == NULL) {
>>>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "RX mbuf alloc failed "
>>>>> + "port_id=%u queue_id=%u",
>>>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->
>>>>> + rx_mbuf_alloc_failed++;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + } else if (nb_hold > rxq->rx_free_thresh) {
>>>>> + uint16_t next_rdt = rxq->rx_free_trigger;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(rxq, false)) {
>>>>> + rte_wmb();
>>>>> + IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->rdt_reg_addr,
>>>>> + next_rdt);
>>>>> + nb_hold -= rxq->rx_free_thresh;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "RX bulk alloc failed "
>>>>> + "port_id=%u queue_id=%u",
>>>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->
>>>>> + rx_mbuf_alloc_failed++;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + nb_hold++;
>>>>> + rxe = &sw_ring[rx_id];
>>>>> + eop = staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_EOP;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + next_id = rx_id + 1;
>>>>> + if (next_id == rxq->nb_rx_desc)
>>>>> + next_id = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Prefetch next mbuf while processing current one. */
>>>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(sw_ring[next_id].mbuf);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * When next RX descriptor is on a cache-line boundary,
>>>>> + * prefetch the next 4 RX descriptors and the next 4 pointers
>>>>> + * to mbufs.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if ((next_id & 0x3) == 0) {
>>>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(&rx_ring[next_id]);
>>>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(&sw_ring[next_id]);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rxm = rxe->mbuf;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!bulk_alloc) {
>>>>> + __le64 dma =
>>>>> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(nmb));
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Update RX descriptor with the physical address of the
>>>>> + * new data buffer of the new allocated mbuf.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rxe->mbuf = nmb;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rxm->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
>>>>> + rxdp->read.hdr_addr = dma;
>>>>> + rxdp->read.pkt_addr = dma;
>>>>> + } else
>>>>> + rxe->mbuf = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Set data length & data buffer address of mbuf.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + data_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length);
>>>>> + rxm->data_len = data_len;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!eop) {
>>>>> + uint16_t nextp_id;
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Get next descriptor index:
>>>>> + * - For RSC it's in the NEXTP field.
>>>>> + * - For a scattered packet - it's just a following
>>>>> + * descriptor.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (ixgbe_rsc_count(&rxd))
>>>>> + nextp_id =
>>>>> + (staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_NEXTP_MASK) >>
>>>>> + IXGBE_RXDADV_NEXTP_SHIFT;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + nextp_id = next_id;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + next_rsc_entry = &sw_rsc_ring[nextp_id];
>>>>> + next_rxe = &sw_ring[nextp_id];
>>>>> + rte_ixgbe_prefetch(next_rxe);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rsc_entry = &sw_rsc_ring[rx_id];
>>>>> + first_seg = rsc_entry->fbuf;
>>>>> + rsc_entry->fbuf = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * If this is the first buffer of the received packet,
>>>>> + * set the pointer to the first mbuf of the packet and
>>>>> + * initialize its context.
>>>>> + * Otherwise, update the total length and the number of
>>>>> segments
>>>>> + * of the current scattered packet, and update the pointer to
>>>>> + * the last mbuf of the current packet.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (first_seg == NULL) {
>>>>> + first_seg = rxm;
>>>>> + first_seg->pkt_len = data_len;
>>>>> + first_seg->nb_segs = 1;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + first_seg->pkt_len += data_len;
>>>>> + first_seg->nb_segs++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + prev_id = rx_id;
>>>>> + rx_id = next_id;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * If this is not the last buffer of the received packet,
>>>>> update
>>>>> + * the pointer to the first mbuf at the NEXTP entry in the
>>>>> + * sw_rsc_ring and continue to parse the RX ring.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (!eop) {
>>>>> + rxm->next = next_rxe->mbuf;
>>>>> + next_rsc_entry->fbuf = first_seg;
>>>>> + goto next_desc;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * This is the last buffer of the received packet - return
>>>>> + * the current cluster to the user.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rxm->next = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Initialize the first mbuf of the returned packet */
>>>>> + ixgbe_fill_cluster_head_buf(first_seg, &rxd, rxq->port_id,
>>>>> + staterr);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Prefetch data of first segment, if configured to do so. */
>>>>> + rte_packet_prefetch((char *)first_seg->buf_addr +
>>>>> + first_seg->data_off);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Store the mbuf address into the next entry of the array
>>>>> + * of returned packets.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rx_pkts[nb_rx++] = first_seg;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Record index of the next RX descriptor to probe.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rxq->rx_tail = rx_id;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * If the number of free RX descriptors is greater than the RX
>>>>> free
>>>>> + * threshold of the queue, advance the Receive Descriptor Tail
>>>>> (RDT)
>>>>> + * register.
>>>>> + * Update the RDT with the value of the last processed RX
>>>>> descriptor
>>>>> + * minus 1, to guarantee that the RDT register is never equal
>>>>> to the
>>>>> + * RDH register, which creates a "full" ring situtation from the
>>>>> + * hardware point of view...
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (!bulk_alloc && nb_hold > rxq->rx_free_thresh) {
>>>>> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u rx_tail=%u "
>>>>> + "nb_hold=%u nb_rx=%u",
>>>>> + rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id, rx_id, nb_hold, nb_rx);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rte_wmb();
>>>>> + IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->rdt_reg_addr, prev_id);
>>>>> + nb_hold = 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rxq->nb_rx_hold = nb_hold;
>>>>> + return nb_rx;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +uint16_t
>>>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
>>>>> **rx_pkts,
>>>>> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, false);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +uint16_t
>>>>> +ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
>>>>> **rx_pkts,
>>>>> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, true);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> uint16_t
>>>>> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>>>> uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>>> @@ -2005,6 +2295,31 @@ ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>> *dev,
>>>>> return (0);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster - free the not-yet-completed RSC cluster
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * The "next" pointer of the last segment of (not-yet-completed)
>>>>> RSC clusters
>>>>> + * in the sw_rsc_ring is not set to NULL but rather points to the next
>>>>> + * mbuf of this RSC aggregation (that has not been completed yet
>>>>> and still
>>>>> + * resides on the HW ring). So, instead of calling for
>>>>> rte_pktmbuf_free() we
>>>>> + * will just free first "nb_segs" segments of the cluster
>>>>> explicitly by calling
>>>>> + * an rte_pktmbuf_free_seg().
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @m RSC cluster head
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + uint8_t i, nb_segs = m->nb_segs;
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf *next_seg;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < nb_segs; i++) {
>>>>> + next_seg = m->next;
>>>>> + rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(m);
>>>>> + m = next_seg;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static void
>>>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -2028,6 +2343,13 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
>>>>> ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>>>> }
>>>>> #endif
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rxq->sw_rsc_ring)
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < rxq->nb_rx_desc; i++)
>>>>> + if (rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf) {
>>>>> + ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster(rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf);
>>>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring[i].fbuf = NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static void
>>>>> @@ -2036,6 +2358,7 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release(struct ixgbe_rx_queue
>>>>> *rxq)
>>>>> if (rxq != NULL) {
>>>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
>>>>> rte_free(rxq->sw_ring);
>>>>> + rte_free(rxq->sw_rsc_ring);
>>>>> rte_free(rxq);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -2158,6 +2481,7 @@ ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>>>> struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>>>>> rxq->nb_rx_hold = 0;
>>>>> rxq->pkt_first_seg = NULL;
>>>>> rxq->pkt_last_seg = NULL;
>>>>> + rxq->rsc_en = 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> int
>>>>> @@ -2172,6 +2496,14 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>> *dev,
>>>>> struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq;
>>>>> struct ixgbe_hw *hw;
>>>>> uint16_t len;
>>>>> + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = { 0 };
>>>>> + struct rte_eth_rxmode *dev_rx_mode = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>>>> + bool rsc_requested = false;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get(dev, &dev_info);
>>>>> + if ((dev_info.rx_offload_capa & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO) &&
>>>>> + dev_rx_mode->enable_lro)
>>>>> + rsc_requested = true;
>>>>>
>>>>> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>>>> hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>>>> @@ -2277,12 +2609,27 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>> *dev,
>>>>> rxq->sw_ring = rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_ring",
>>>>> sizeof(struct ixgbe_rx_entry) * len,
>>>>> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
>>>>> - if (rxq->sw_ring == NULL) {
>>>>> + if (!rxq->sw_ring) {
>>>>> ixgbe_rx_queue_release(rxq);
>>>>> return (-ENOMEM);
>>>>> }
>>>>> - PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "sw_ring=%p hw_ring=%p dma_addr=0x%"PRIx64,
>>>>> - rxq->sw_ring, rxq->rx_ring, rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rsc_requested) {
>>>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring =
>>>>> + rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_rsc_ring",
>>>>> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_rsc_entry) * len,
>>>>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
>>>>> + if (!rxq->sw_rsc_ring) {
>>>>> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release(rxq);
>>>>> + return (-ENOMEM);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + } else
>>>>> + rxq->sw_rsc_ring = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "sw_ring=%p sw_rsc_ring=%p hw_ring=%p "
>>>>> + "dma_addr=0x%"PRIx64,
>>>>> + rxq->sw_ring, rxq->sw_rsc_ring, rxq->rx_ring,
>>>>> + rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!rte_is_power_of_2(nb_desc)) {
>>>>> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "queue[%d] doesn't meet Vector Rx "
>>>>> @@ -3527,6 +3874,91 @@ ixgbe_dev_mq_tx_configure(struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>> *dev)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc - Calculate the RSCCTL[n].MAXDESC for PF
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Return the RSCCTL[n].MAXDESC for 82599 and x540 PF devices
>>>>> according to the
>>>>> + * spec rev. 3.0 chapter 8.2.3.8.13.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @pool Memory pool of the Rx queue
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static inline uint32_t
>>>>> +ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc(struct rte_mempool *pool)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private *mp_priv =
>>>>> rte_mempool_get_priv(pool);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* MAXDESC * SRRCTL.BSIZEPKT must not exceed 64 KB minus one */
>>>>> + uint16_t maxdesc =
>>>>> + IPV4_MAX_PKT_LEN /
>>>>> + (mp_priv->mbuf_data_room_size - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (maxdesc >= 16)
>>>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_16;
>>>>> + else if (maxdesc >= 8)
>>>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_8;
>>>>> + else if (maxdesc >= 4)
>>>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_4;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + return IXGBE_RSCCTL_MAXDESC_1;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ixgbe_set_ivar - Setup the correct IVAR register for a
>>>>> particular MSIX
>>>>> + * interrupt
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * (Taken from FreeBSD tree)
>>>>> + * (yes this is all very magic and confusing :)
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @dev port handle
>>>>> + * @entry the register array entry
>>>>> + * @vector the MSIX vector for this queue
>>>>> + * @type RX/TX/MISC
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +ixgbe_set_ivar(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, u8 entry, u8 vector, s8 type)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>>>> + u32 ivar, index;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vector |= IXGBE_IVAR_ALLOC_VAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + switch (hw->mac.type) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + case ixgbe_mac_82598EB:
>>>>> + if (type == -1)
>>>>> + entry = IXGBE_IVAR_OTHER_CAUSES_INDEX;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + entry += (type * 64);
>>>>> + index = (entry >> 2) & 0x1F;
>>>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(index));
>>>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << (8 * (entry & 0x3)));
>>>>> + ivar |= (vector << (8 * (entry & 0x3)));
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(index), ivar);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + case ixgbe_mac_82599EB:
>>>>> + case ixgbe_mac_X540:
>>>>> + if (type == -1) { /* MISC IVAR */
>>>>> + index = (entry & 1) * 8;
>>>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR_MISC);
>>>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << index);
>>>>> + ivar |= (vector << index);
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR_MISC, ivar);
>>>>> + } else { /* RX/TX IVARS */
>>>>> + index = (16 * (entry & 1)) + (8 * type);
>>>>> + ivar = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(entry >> 1));
>>>>> + ivar &= ~(0xFF << index);
>>>>> + ivar |= (vector << index);
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_IVAR(entry >> 1), ivar);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>>>> @@ -3545,7 +3977,24 @@ void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>> *dev)
>>>>> hw->rx_vec_allowed = false;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Initialize the appropriate LRO callback.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * If all queues satisfy the bulk allocation preconditions
>>>>> + * (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed is TRUE) then we may use bulk
>>>>> allocation.
>>>>> + * Otherwise use a single allocation version.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (dev->data->lro) {
>>>>> + if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "LRO is requested. Using a bulk "
>>>>> + "allocation version");
>>>>> + dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "LRO is requested. Using a single "
>>>>> + "allocation version");
>>>>> + dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + } else if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Set the non-LRO scattered callback: there are Vector and
>>>>> * single allocation versions.
>>>>> @@ -3595,6 +4044,149 @@ void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct
>>>>> rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ixgbe_set_rsc - configure RSC related port HW registers
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Configures the port's RSC related registers according to the
>>>>> 4.6.7.2 chapter
>>>>> + * of 82599 Spec (x540 configuration is virtually the same).
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @dev port handle
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Returns 0 in case of success or a non-zero error code
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static int
>>>>> +ixgbe_set_rsc(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct rte_eth_rxmode *rx_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
>>>>> IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>>>> + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = { 0 };
>>>>> + bool rsc_capable = false;
>>>>> + uint16_t i;
>>>>> + uint32_t rdrxctl;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Sanity check */
>>>>> + dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get(dev, &dev_info);
>>>>> + if (dev_info.rx_offload_capa & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO)
>>>>> + rsc_capable = true;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!rsc_capable && rx_conf->enable_lro) {
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(CRIT, "LRO is requested on HW that doesn't "
>>>>> + "support it");
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* RSC global configuration (chapter 4.6.7.2.1 of 82599 Spec) */
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!rx_conf->hw_strip_crc && rx_conf->enable_lro) {
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * According to chapter of 4.6.7.2.1 of the Spec Rev.
>>>>> + * 3.0 RSC configuration requires HW CRC stripping being
>>>>> + * enabled. If user requested both HW CRC stripping off
>>>>> + * and RSC on - return an error.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(CRIT, "LRO can't be enabled when HW CRC "
>>>>> + "is disabled");
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* RFCTL configuration */
>>>>> + if (rsc_capable) {
>>>>> + uint32_t rfctl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RFCTL);
>>>>> + if (rx_conf->enable_lro)
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Since NFS packets coalescing is not supported - clear
>>>>> + * RFCTL.NFSW_DIS and RFCTL.NFSR_DIS when RSC is
>>>>> + * enabled.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + rfctl &= ~(IXGBE_RFCTL_RSC_DIS | IXGBE_RFCTL_NFSW_DIS |
>>>>> + IXGBE_RFCTL_NFSR_DIS);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + rfctl |= IXGBE_RFCTL_RSC_DIS;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RFCTL, rfctl);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* If LRO hasn't been requested - we are done here. */
>>>>> + if (!rx_conf->enable_lro)
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Set RDRXCTL.RSCACKC bit */
>>>>> + rdrxctl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL);
>>>>> + rdrxctl |= IXGBE_RDRXCTL_RSCACKC;
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL, rdrxctl);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Per-queue RSC configuration (chapter 4.6.7.2.2 of 82599
>>>>> Spec) */
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
>>>>> + uint32_t srrctl =
>>>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx));
>>>>> + uint32_t rscctl =
>>>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RSCCTL(rxq->reg_idx));
>>>>> + uint32_t psrtype =
>>>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_PSRTYPE(rxq->reg_idx));
>>>>> + uint32_t eitr =
>>>>> + IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_EITR(rxq->reg_idx));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * ixgbe PMD doesn't support header-split at the moment.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Following the 4.6.7.2.1 chapter of the 82599/x540
>>>>> + * Spec if RSC is enabled the SRRCTL[n].BSIZEHEADER
>>>>> + * should be configured even if header split is not
>>>>> + * enabled. We will configure it 128 bytes following the
>>>>> + * recommendation in the spec.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + srrctl &= ~IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDR_MASK;
>>>>> + srrctl |= (128 << IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDRSIZE_SHIFT) &
>>>>> + IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEHDR_MASK;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * TODO: Consider setting the Receive Descriptor Minimum
>>>>> + * Threshold Size for an RSC case. This is not an obviously
>>>>> + * beneficiary option but the one worth considering...
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rscctl |= IXGBE_RSCCTL_RSCEN;
>>>>> + rscctl |= ixgbe_get_rscctl_maxdesc(rxq->mb_pool);
>>>>> + psrtype |= IXGBE_PSRTYPE_TCPHDR;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * RSC: Set ITR interval corresponding to 2K ints/s.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Full-sized RSC aggregations for a 10Gb/s link will
>>>>> + * arrive at about 20K aggregation/s rate.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * 2K inst/s rate will make only 10% of the
>>>>> + * aggregations to be closed due to the interrupt timer
>>>>> + * expiration for a streaming at wire-speed case.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * For a sparse streaming case this setting will yield
>>>>> + * at most 500us latency for a single RSC aggregation.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + eitr &= ~IXGBE_EITR_ITR_INT_MASK;
>>>>> + eitr |= IXGBE_EITR_INTERVAL_US(500) | IXGBE_EITR_CNT_WDIS;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx), srrctl);
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RSCCTL(rxq->reg_idx), rscctl);
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_PSRTYPE(rxq->reg_idx), psrtype);
>>>>> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_EITR(rxq->reg_idx), eitr);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * RSC requires the mapping of the queue to the
>>>>> + * interrupt vector.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + ixgbe_set_ivar(dev, rxq->reg_idx, i, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rxq->rsc_en = 1;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dev->data->lro = 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "enabling LRO mode");
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Initializes Receive Unit.
>>>>> */
>>>>> @@ -3615,6 +4207,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> uint16_t buf_size;
>>>>> uint16_t i;
>>>>> struct rte_eth_rxmode *rx_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
>>>>> + int rc;
>>>>>
>>>>> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>>>> hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>>>>> @@ -3724,6 +4317,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
>>>>> srrctl |= ((buf_size >> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT) &
>>>>> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_MASK);
>>>>> +
>>>>> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_SRRCTL(rxq->reg_idx), srrctl);
>>>>>
>>>>> buf_size = (uint16_t) ((srrctl &
>>>>> IXGBE_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_MASK) <<
>>>>> @@ -3738,8 +4332,6 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> if (rx_conf->enable_scatter)
>>>>> dev->data->scattered_rx = 1;
>>>>>
>>>>> - ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
>>>>> -
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Device configured with multiple RX queues.
>>>>> */
>>>>> @@ -3770,6 +4362,12 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RDRXCTL, rdrxctl);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + rc = ixgbe_set_rsc(dev);
>>>>> + if (rc)
>>>>> + return rc;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>>>> index 3937cf6..120bbbd 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>>>>> @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_entry {
>>>>> struct rte_mbuf *mbuf; /**< mbuf associated with RX
>>>>> descriptor. */
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +struct ixgbe_rsc_entry {
>>>>> + struct rte_mbuf *fbuf; /**< First segment of the fragmented
>>>>> packet. */
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Structure associated with each descriptor of the TX ring of a
>>>>> TX queue.
>>>>> */
>>>>> @@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_queue {
>>>>> volatile uint32_t *rdt_reg_addr; /**< RDT register address. */
>>>>> volatile uint32_t *rdh_reg_addr; /**< RDH register address. */
>>>>> struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring; /**< address of RX software
>>>>> ring. */
>>>>> + struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *sw_rsc_ring; /**< address of RSC
>>>>> software ring. */
>>>>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt_first_seg; /**< First segment of current
>>>>> packet. */
>>>>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt_last_seg; /**< Last segment of current
>>>>> packet. */
>>>>> uint64_t mbuf_initializer; /**< value to init mbufs */
>>>>> @@ -126,6 +131,7 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_queue {
>>>>> uint8_t port_id; /**< Device port identifier. */
>>>>> uint8_t crc_len; /**< 0 if CRC stripped, 4
>>>>> otherwise. */
>>>>> uint8_t drop_en; /**< If not 0, set
>>>>> SRRCTL.Drop_En. */
>>>>> + uint8_t rsc_en; /**< If not 0, RSC is enabled. */
>>>>> uint8_t rx_deferred_start; /**< not in global dev
>>>>> start. */
>>>>> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
>>>>> /** need to alloc dummy mbuf, for wraparound when scanning hw
>>>>> ring */
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-31 10:25 Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-31 11:40 ` Vlad Zolotarov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-18 17:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-18 17:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ixgbe: Add LRO support Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 14:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-30 15:37 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-30 15:57 ` Vlad Zolotarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551A87AF.4040805@cloudius-systems.com \
--to=vladz@cloudius-systems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).