From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE204377A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 16:18:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2015 07:18:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,538,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="676354409"
Received: from unknown (HELO [10.217.248.56]) ([10.217.248.56])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2015 07:18:51 -0700
Message-ID: <5523E720.2050207@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:18:08 +0200
From: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Kinzie <ehkinzie@gmail.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
References: <1428339685-27686-1-git-send-email-ehkinzie@gmail.com>
 <1428339685-27686-5-git-send-email-ehkinzie@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1428339685-27686-5-git-send-email-ehkinzie@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] bond mode 4: allow external state machine
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:18:56 -0000

On 2015-04-06 19:01, Eric Kinzie wrote:

Interesting patch. I will closer look at this tomorrow.

For now I have first comments:

> +static void bond_mode_8023ad_ext_periodic_cb(void *arg);
> +
>   #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BOND_DEBUG_8023AD
>   #define MODE4_DEBUG(fmt, ...) RTE_LOG(DEBUG, PMD, "%6u [Port %u: %s] " fmt, \
>   			bond_dbg_get_time_diff_ms(), slave_id, \
> @@ -1014,6 +1016,8 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_conf_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>   	conf->tx_period_ms = mode4->tx_period_timeout / ms_ticks;
>   	conf->update_timeout_ms = mode4->update_timeout_us / 1000;
>   	conf->rx_marker_period_ms = mode4->rx_marker_timeout / ms_ticks;
> +	conf->slowrx_cb = mode4->slowrx_cb;
> +	conf->external_sm = mode4->external_sm;

mode4->external_sm flag realy needed? Why do not use mode4->slowrx_cb as 
external state machine indicator?

>   }
>
>   void
> @@ -1035,6 +1039,8 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>   		conf->tx_period_ms = BOND_8023AD_TX_MACHINE_PERIOD_MS;
>   		conf->rx_marker_period_ms = BOND_8023AD_RX_MARKER_PERIOD_MS;
>   		conf->update_timeout_ms = BOND_MODE_8023AX_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS;
> +		conf->slowrx_cb = NULL;
> +		conf->external_sm = 0;
>   	}
>
>   	mode4->fast_periodic_timeout = conf->fast_periodic_ms * ms_ticks;
> @@ -1045,6 +1051,8 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>   	mode4->tx_period_timeout = conf->tx_period_ms * ms_ticks;
>   	mode4->rx_marker_timeout = conf->rx_marker_period_ms * ms_ticks;
>   	mode4->update_timeout_us = conf->update_timeout_ms * 1000;
> +	mode4->slowrx_cb = conf->slowrx_cb;
> +	mode4->external_sm = conf->external_sm;
>   }
>
>   int
> @@ -1062,6 +1070,13 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
>   int
>   bond_mode_8023ad_start(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
>   {
> +	struct bond_dev_private *internals = bond_dev->data->dev_private;
> +	struct mode8023ad_private *mode4 = &internals->mode4;
> +
> +	if (mode4->external_sm)
> +		return rte_eal_alarm_set(BOND_MODE_8023AX_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000,
> +			&bond_mode_8023ad_ext_periodic_cb, bond_dev);
> +
>   	return rte_eal_alarm_set(BOND_MODE_8023AX_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000,
>   			&bond_mode_8023ad_periodic_cb, bond_dev);
>   }
> @@ -1069,6 +1084,13 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_start(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
>   void
>   bond_mode_8023ad_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
>   {
> +	struct bond_dev_private *internals = bond_dev->data->dev_private;
> +	struct mode8023ad_private *mode4 = &internals->mode4;
> +
> +	if (mode4->external_sm) {

This is bad idea. If bond_mode_8023ad_setup will be called you might 
have two handlers running for while. You should stop mode 4 by invoking 
bond_mode_8023ad_stop() before you set mode4->external_sm and then, if 
mode 4 was running, start it again.

Also, maybe a renaming "external_sm" to "state_machine_cb", set it to 
against default one and using it without "if()" will simplify code. It 
is no crucial but will eliminate couple of if's. In 
rte_eth_bond_8023ad_ext_slowtx() you can compare it against default one.

> +		rte_eal_alarm_cancel(&bond_mode_8023ad_ext_periodic_cb, bond_dev);
> +		return;
> +	}
>   	rte_eal_alarm_cancel(&bond_mode_8023ad_periodic_cb, bond_dev);
>   }
>
> @@ -1215,3 +1237,156 @@ rte_eth_bond_8023ad_slave_info(uint8_t port_id, uint8_t slave_id,
>   	info->agg_port_id = port->aggregator_port_id;
>   	return 0;
>   }

-- 
Pawel