From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942972A5B for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2015 00:25:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,629,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="684389168" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.217.248.56]) ([10.217.248.56]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2015 00:25:15 -0700 Message-ID: <55389E44.8030603@intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:24:52 +0200 From: Pawel Wodkowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org References: <1429716828-19012-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <1429716828-19012-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1429716828-19012-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Implement memcmp using AVX/SSE instructio X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:25:17 -0000 On 2015-04-22 17:33, Ravi Kerur wrote: > +/** > + * Compare bytes between two locations. The locations must not overlap. > + * > + * @note This is implemented as a macro, so it's address should not be taken > + * and care is needed as parameter expressions may be evaluated multiple times. > + * > + * @param src_1 > + * Pointer to the first source of the data. > + * @param src_2 > + * Pointer to the second source of the data. > + * @param n > + * Number of bytes to compare. > + * @return > + * true if equal otherwise false. > + */ > +static inline bool > +rte_memcmp(const void *src_1, const void *src, > + size_t n) __attribute__((always_inline)); You are exposing this as public API, so I think you should follow description bellow or not call this _memcmp_ int memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, size_t n); The memcmp() function returns an integer less than, equal to, or greater than zero if the first n bytes of s1 is found, respectively, to be less than, to match, or be greater than the first n bytes of s2. -- Pawel