From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0932716 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so147325712wgy.2 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sgRYJyGWgzVhgrX8hcBhBhErZyTfyGVp51aj7rTBCMQ=; b=HtWZq6OdBGIuIm6/0fdrhsYXe0legWHOi8QrpLm/FlUCdUARgNg3Aw9cmJ58ThGdkk VmU9vZKi06KexkproLO5y2uSAdEndZ0Gdxwfs+K0OSIkaAQCY64bdt1hi2LN75t6uHqr jLe/R+k7+t47W/R7hM+odd0zPRjROBArO8DdIcyFmrKquHg+qj99qhnJUh7j299wD1k3 J/UpaHefovauTI5aol/iI0az50RHJ8N1F39/kIEzgQ7SWCoIDdfNS1w3peqpj4XftqZV HejiXm9P9NzWxGoyIfG9QhW2g43L0fwbNcz5fpMIqgC1PBLt4xKkfTAPtRmYfkhlbftp tG4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlljy6S/O1hgKvNpIBaoGL30WCh3zII2clvBJDP8Qr5QWYDtoDMMXBSWtO4GLxsdKSNnOAr X-Received: by 10.180.37.3 with SMTP id u3mr28975581wij.43.1430219704053; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([90.152.119.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz4sm15890304wib.17.2015.04.28.04.15.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <553F6BBA.20607@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:15:06 +0100 From: Zoltan Kiss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Monjalon References: <1429610122-30943-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420BD6@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <553A1D3B.5040400@linaro.org> <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:15:04 -0000 On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss: >> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM >>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect >>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also >>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on >>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements >>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the >>>> last patches easier. >>> >>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev >> >> When does this series get merged? > > It was acked on April 22 and your question was 2 days later on April 24. > Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked? I was just curious about when to expect it, so I can plan to do some further work based on it, but nothing pressing. Regards, Zoltan > Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on? > Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged. >