From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0932716
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:15:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so147325712wgy.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=sgRYJyGWgzVhgrX8hcBhBhErZyTfyGVp51aj7rTBCMQ=;
 b=HtWZq6OdBGIuIm6/0fdrhsYXe0legWHOi8QrpLm/FlUCdUARgNg3Aw9cmJ58ThGdkk
 VmU9vZKi06KexkproLO5y2uSAdEndZ0Gdxwfs+K0OSIkaAQCY64bdt1hi2LN75t6uHqr
 jLe/R+k7+t47W/R7hM+odd0zPRjROBArO8DdIcyFmrKquHg+qj99qhnJUh7j299wD1k3
 J/UpaHefovauTI5aol/iI0az50RHJ8N1F39/kIEzgQ7SWCoIDdfNS1w3peqpj4XftqZV
 HejiXm9P9NzWxGoyIfG9QhW2g43L0fwbNcz5fpMIqgC1PBLt4xKkfTAPtRmYfkhlbftp
 tG4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlljy6S/O1hgKvNpIBaoGL30WCh3zII2clvBJDP8Qr5QWYDtoDMMXBSWtO4GLxsdKSNnOAr
X-Received: by 10.180.37.3 with SMTP id u3mr28975581wij.43.1430219704053;
 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([90.152.119.35])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz4sm15890304wib.17.2015.04.28.04.15.02
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <553F6BBA.20607@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:15:06 +0100
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <1429610122-30943-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420BD6@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <553A1D3B.5040400@linaro.org> <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:15:04 -0000



On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss:
>> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
>>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
>>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
>>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
>>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
>>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
>>>> last patches easier.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>>
>> When does this series get merged?
>
> It was acked on April 22  and your question was 2 days later on April 24.
> Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked?

I was just curious about when to expect it, so I can plan to do some 
further work based on it, but nothing pressing.

Regards,

Zoltan

> Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on?
> Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged.
>