From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:56:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55535807.5070900@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D178B8BE.20071%keith.wiles@intel.com>
Hi Keith,
On 05/13/2015 03:17 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
>>> endif # ifeq ($(NO_AUTOLIBS),)
>>>
>>> -LDLIBS += $(CPU_LDLIBS)
>>> +LDLIBS += $(_LDLIBS-y) $(EXTRA_LDLIBS)
>>>
>>
>> As discussed in the previous mail, all things that are about
>> EXTRA_LDLIBS should be moved in the second patch. Therefore,
>> the title of the second patch should not be "update doc...", but
>> something like "mk: introduce EXTRA_LDLIBS...".
>>
>> By the way, I missed that before, but it seems that your
>> patch removes CPU_LDLIBS, I don't think it's correct.
>
> I found no reference to CPU_LDLIBS in the docs or code other then then one
> line. We now have EXTRA_LDLIBS for the command line, right?
Yes, but your patch says "simplify the ifdef". Removing
a variable (even if it is not used) in this patch is not
a good idea.
Now, the CPU_CFLAGS, CPU_LDFLAGS, CPU_LDLIBS can be defined internally
by the rte.vars.mk in mk/arch/ or mk/machine/ directories.
Regards,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <017274>
2015-05-11 23:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] Simplify " Keith Wiles
2015-05-11 23:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] Update Docs for new EXTRA_LDLIBS variable Keith Wiles
2015-05-12 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk Olivier MATZ
2015-05-12 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mk:Simplify " Keith Wiles
2015-05-12 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mk:Update Docs for new EXTRA_LDLIBS variable Keith Wiles
2015-05-13 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk Olivier MATZ
2015-05-13 13:17 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-13 13:56 ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2015-05-13 14:04 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-13 14:28 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-05-13 14:34 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-13 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in the makefile Keith Wiles
2015-05-13 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/2] mk:Introduce the EXTRA_LDLIBS variable Keith Wiles
2015-05-14 12:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in the makefile Olivier MATZ
2015-05-14 15:14 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-14 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 " Keith Wiles
2015-05-14 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/2] mk:Introduce the EXTRA_LDLIBS variable Keith Wiles
2015-05-14 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in the makefile Olivier MATZ
2015-05-14 21:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-13 14:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mk:Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk Wiles, Keith
2015-05-14 12:21 ` Olivier MATZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55535807.5070900@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).