From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFD43775 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:01:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by qgew3 with SMTP id w3so11030211qge.2 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wir3jLuuZMKpvdy3Gwr9VyJrU4f/FH8RRTfGkkrCRi0=; b=v6FlTpJ+Hlv4ZL6FfGzu5d97PoldsYvs3CD0pDUXaTWq5IUviVtisTjKSR/x9DphXP QQJ4CXxNqWjvkcbbPonyTGfRwANyJw/HozTrJ4CKEUrPeENtjH5y9PvmjdD+ir+H6lNw k/GWbUM86jVKOhXvxN1i0yLc0XWEOcjUmerm0/qg5IomFnWDF7zQ3eQ53TZBunB0/vs5 mEk6IYeDGTBszR88aWeexjC0ZIrit9UHGLgCk/aPXrZUnQ+PdUTNQho2Gi9xHirCwUPi +tMPh3y+I6GhY9r3vNRjtUV9pVhvUD0hCMypqn8h3mDyw+wTJrZhmG3MEZ5NW5B2ttiD gJWg== X-Received: by 10.140.151.15 with SMTP id 15mr12721533qhx.104.1431698461614; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfherb.local (pool-72-84-233-168.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net. [72.84.233.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o189sm1052379qhb.25.2015.05.15.07.01.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 May 2015 07:01:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5555FC1C.2020202@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:01:00 -0400 From: Thomas F Herbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org References: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC15D9C@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> In-Reply-To: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC15D9C@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: therbert@redhat.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance issue with ovs + dpdk2.0 with vhost X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: thomasfherbert@gmail.com List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:01:02 -0000 On 5/15/15 9:55 AM, Rao, Ravi wrote: > Hi All, > I am trying to get a Guest VM connected to the dpdkvhost interface on a host which has the ovs running from the latest ovs git and dpdk2.0. Looks like I am missing something as 95% of traffic is not getting to the VM. Can one of you please let me know which mailing list I should be posting the details for getting a resolution. Is it this dpdk list OR would it be the openvswitch list? You could also try the openvswitch discuss list but this list is a good starting point. I am working with vhost/dpdk2.0 and ovs and others are too. Could you please send more details about what you are seeing? > Regards, > Ravi.. -- Thomas F. Herbert