From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ernst.netinsight.se (ernst.netinsight.se [194.16.221.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 436533B5 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 07:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.100.1.152] (unverified [10.100.1.152]) by ernst.netinsight.se (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 27 May 2015 07:59:24 +0200 Message-ID: <55655D3D.8070208@netinsight.net> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 07:59:25 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2ltb24gS8OlZ3N0csO2bQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] Small request for patch review in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 05:59:29 -0000 Hi! As a well-meaning outsider submitting small patches to DPDK, I'd very much appreciate help from the community with review and comments. Since I'm a DPDK newbie, the patches might be incorrect or wrong in some other way, so I think it's even more important with reviews for people like me. But I can't help getting this nagging feeling that the patches are actually lost in the flood of mail to the DPDK mailing list, since I haven't gotten any reaction to any of the three patches I've sent the last month. The patches in question are kni: Add set_rx_mode callback to handle multicast groups rte_reorder: Allow sequence numbers > 0 as starting point eal_common_options: Allow combining -m and --no-huge so if someone feels like mining their DPDK mail box, please review if you have the time and knowledge about the area :-) And I can't help thinking that maybe github pull requests would be harder to miss (or at least easier to find after a few weeks of other traffic). // Simon