From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ernst.netinsight.se (ernst.netinsight.se [194.16.221.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1540B11C5 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 14:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.100.1.152] (unverified [10.100.1.152]) by ernst.netinsight.se (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 28 May 2015 14:12:21 +0200 Message-ID: <55670625.5080805@netinsight.net> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:12:21 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Simon_K=E5gstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Wodkowski, PawelX" , "Zhang, Helin" , Alexander Guy , Julien Cretin , "Buriez, Patrice" References: <20150527134524.5f107cac@miho> <5566EFDD.5040209@netinsight.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:12:26 -0000 On 2015-05-28 12:48, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote: >>> Please only check if UTS_RELEASE is available on all Ubuntu versions DPDK >> support. >> >> From some digging, it appears it entered the kernel tree in 2006 and >> moved to include/generated/ in 2009 so I guess that should be fine for >> DPDK builds? > > I also think that it is OK but I also think should check by building you (o ask > someone to do it for you) on those systems not by theory :) Well, I think this is one of the main motivations from something like what Thomas F. Herbert proposed in another thread recently, DPDK: Proposal for a patch patch-test integration tree basically, a continuous-integration-type of system should test-build (and probably test) any prospective patch to see that it builds for various targets. In my view, this would be a perfect match for github+travis-ci. Anyway, I'll see if I can dig up an older Ubuntu to build on, unless someone else steps up and tests the patch. (My issue to start with was that the build fails on a 14.04 chroot on a 12.04 host, but I only have access to the chroot there). // Simon