DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas F Herbert <therbert@redhat.com>
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK: Proposal for a patch patch-test integration tree
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:18:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556723C0.8060709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5566359B.6050408@6wind.com>



On 5/27/15 5:22 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> On 27/05/2015 22:48, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
>> Work Flow and Process:
>>
>> All patches will be taken from from public submissions to dpdk-dev.org
>> scraped from dpdk patchwork. Patches will be applied to the patch-test
>> tree and tested against HEAD as they are received. The feedback from the
>> testing will be provided to the community. The patch-test tree will
>> periodically be git pull'ed from dpdk.
>>
>> Longer term goal:
>>
>> Initially, the patches will be applied along with some simple smoke
>> tests. The longer term goal is to automate this process, apply more
>> extensive tests and post the results in dpdk patchwork,
>> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/ which would have an
>> accompanying mailing list for distribution of a results summary of the
>> tests.
>
> thanks for helping.
>
> It could be broken into two parts:
>    - patch-test-net-next,
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/MAINTAINERS#n190
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net
>
>    - patch-test-other-next,
> all, excepted drivers
Vincent, I don't understand what is in patch-test-next vs 
patch-test-other-next. Is patch-test-other-next to be for pmd drivers 
that are not included in the standard dpdk release?
>
> Best regards,
>    Vincent

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-27 20:48 Thomas F Herbert
2015-05-27 21:22 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-05-28 14:18   ` Thomas F Herbert [this message]
     [not found] ` <20150527210624.GA15347@mhcomputing.net>
2015-05-27 22:36   ` Thomas F Herbert
2015-05-28  6:54 ` Simon Kågström
2015-05-28 13:10   ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-28  9:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
     [not found]   ` <556728A1.8070403@redhat.com>
2015-05-28 14:44     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-28 15:01       ` Thomas F Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556723C0.8060709@redhat.com \
    --to=therbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vincent.jardin@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).