From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B004C5A56 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:35:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2015 01:35:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,551,1427785200"; d="scan'208,217";a="740775688" Received: from smonroyx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.10]) ([10.237.221.10]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2015 01:35:52 -0700 Message-ID: <55700DE7.10403@intel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:35:51 +0100 From: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dax Rawal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] dynamic memzones" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:35:56 -0000 On 03/06/2015 20:13, Dax Rawal wrote: > Hi Sergio, > >TODOs: > > - Implement memzone_unreserve, simply call rte_malloc_free. > > - Implement mempool_delete, simply call rte_memzone_unreserve. > > - Init heaps with all available memsegs at once. > > - Review symbols in version map. > I do not see rte_memzone_unreserve in API documentation. Is this patch already committed so that we have function like rte_mempool_delete() > Thanks > Dax No, it is not merged yet. That was just an RFC, still need to send new patch with updates/changes. The feature is expected for 2.1 release if everything goes according to plan. Sergio