From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Jiawei Wang <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>,
viacheslavo@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
ferruh.yigit@amd.com, Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, rasland@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:56:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557ee985-b634-f630-0ef4-1b28f876f690@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230217105026.12927-2-jiaweiw@nvidia.com>
On 2/17/23 13:50, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> When multiple ports are aggregated into a single DPDK port,
> (example: Linux bonding, DPDK bonding, failsafe, etc.),
> we want to know which port use for Tx via a queue.
>
> This patch introduces the new ethdev API
> rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity(), it's used to map a Tx queue
> with an aggregated port of the DPDK port (specified with port_id),
> The affinity is the number of the aggregated port.
> Value 0 means no affinity and traffic could be routed to any
> aggregated port, this is the default current behavior.
>
> The maximum number of affinity is given by rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports().
>
> Add the trace point for ethdev rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports()
> and rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity() functions.
>
> Add the testpmd command line:
> testpmd> port config (port_id) txq (queue_id) affinity (value)
>
> For example, there're two physical ports connected to
> a single DPDK port (port id 0), and affinity 1 stood for
> the first physical port and affinity 2 stood for the second
> physical port.
> Use the below commands to config tx phy affinity for per Tx Queue:
> port config 0 txq 0 affinity 1
> port config 0 txq 1 affinity 1
> port config 0 txq 2 affinity 2
> port config 0 txq 3 affinity 2
>
> These commands config the Tx Queue index 0 and Tx Queue index 1 with
> phy affinity 1, uses Tx Queue 0 or Tx Queue 1 send packets,
> these packets will be sent from the first physical port, and similar
> with the second physical port if sending packets with Tx Queue 2
> or Tx Queue 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiawei Wang <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
[snip]
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> index 6a550cfc83..b7fdc454a8 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> @@ -1171,6 +1171,40 @@ typedef int (*eth_tx_descriptor_dump_t)(const struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint16_t queue_id, uint16_t offset,
> uint16_t num, FILE *file);
>
> +/**
> + * @internal
> + * Get the number of aggregated ports.
> + *
> + * @param port_id
> + * The port identifier of the Ethernet device.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * Negative errno value on error, 0 or positive on success.
> + *
> + * @retval >=0
> + * The number of aggregated port if success.
> + * @retval -ENOTSUP
> + * Get aggregated ports API is not supported.
> + */
> +typedef int (*eth_count_aggr_ports_t)(uint16_t port_id);
Why does use port_id as the first parameter whereas all other
driver callbacks use 'struct rte_eth_dev *'?
> +
> +/**
> + * @internal
> + * Map a Tx queue with an aggregated port of the DPDK port.
> + *
> + * @param port_id
> + * The identifier of the port used in rte_eth_tx_burst().
> + * @param tx_queue_id
> + * The index of the transmit queue used in rte_eth_tx_burst().
> + * @param affinity
> + * The number of the aggregated port.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * Negative on error, 0 on success.
> + */
> +typedef int (*eth_map_aggr_tx_affinity_t)(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
> + uint8_t affinity);
same herre
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index 055c46082b..1a63f9fb7a 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -6946,6 +6946,78 @@ rte_eth_buffer_split_get_supported_hdr_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t *ptypes
> return j;
> }
>
> +int rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports(uint16_t port_id)
> +{
> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +
> + if (*dev->dev_ops->count_aggr_ports == NULL)
Is it OK that tracing is long in this case?
> + return 0;
> + ret = eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->count_aggr_ports)(port_id));
> +
> + rte_eth_trace_count_aggr_ports(port_id, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221221102934.13822-1-jiaweiw@nvidia.com/>
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-06 15:29 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-07 9:40 ` Ori Kam
2023-02-09 19:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-10 14:06 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 9:38 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 10:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Added support for Tx queue mapping with an aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: introduce the Tx map API for aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-15 11:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 6:44 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 8:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 9:50 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: add Aggregated affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-16 17:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 12:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 12:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2023-02-17 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:05 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 13:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 15:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 13:01 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:07 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557ee985-b634-f630-0ef4-1b28f876f690@oktetlabs.ru \
--to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jiaweiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).