From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8407AC62A for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wilj4 with SMTP id j4so1576523wil.0 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLKjsITruSG1wQU2SwnnveC3Zb00AdNBorw+1TpMjjQ=; b=S+4G0X0D8bNOE3HfJqqYr+mmdsRSrfYKSy8pjRFTeyYPCEdFCV53ejYxv8Y7A/MWXX k+zBa1gIDsRWB9DuIRFcwY1ZJMDsnmkhBizvtMiNjuQTbl6OhDWLDvN0dXRyqmIua4Ww tPDCyjsl3aYKglO1fcvPlcGdNnQKqWOChbeQeXugLTQHhFMsVu0AOmdGeBFxAj6/jWBk 4sZELF8wg47Yt8UzBBBHhZ5YAjLuWlh3nHcHSBhbg9ACCpPSvb+QZoAtUsg5NRqqmRKG wIHmJFKS/qpMsr/ZpmiQ434C0QeJY475psRl+bmyKLVOYHBB3OXCEQsSG9SFHMXv4HgZ stQw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxUpkoUGIzEaPADnPsj7xW6/ayz3zI4DrjFbt3i4WSh3o1aTlKoCM0YvrrygYCqRnnGWpa X-Received: by 10.180.94.35 with SMTP id cz3mr41269wib.85.1434662038357; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturne.dev.6wind.com ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:226:b9ff:fec7:e133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm632425wiv.9.2015.06.18.14.13.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55833494.9050804@6wind.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:13:56 +0200 From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Thomas Monjalon References: <9092314.MoyqUJ5VU2@xps13> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D6D24C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D6D24C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] important design choices - statistics - ABI X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:13:58 -0000 On 18/06/2015 18:55, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > I like Olivier's proposal on using a single option (CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI) to control all of these changes instead of a separate option per patch set (seehttp://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-June/019147.html), so I think we should rework the affected patch sets to use that approach for 2.1. Do we have any other options to meet the short deadlines of 2.1?